Search for: "California v. Jones" Results 1041 - 1060 of 1,312
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm by Bexis
  A raft of California intermediate appellate decisions applies the learned intermediary rule to medical devices. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
(ipeg) (IP Watch) Holding up products at EU borders using patents (ipeg) Improving the links between ESOs and the European Patent Office (IP:JUR) General Court affirms earlier Board of Appeal's decision that "James Jones" is confusingly similar to "JACK & JONES", in connection with clothing in Class 25 (Class 46) Clutter on the Community Trademark Register (SOLO Independent IP Practitioners) No strange aroma, but will Longkou Fen Si pass the test? [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
(ipeg) (IP Watch) Holding up products at EU borders using patents (ipeg) Improving the links between ESOs and the European Patent Office (IP:JUR) General Court affirms earlier Board of Appeal's decision that "James Jones" is confusingly similar to "JACK & JONES", in connection with clothing in Class 25 (Class 46) Clutter on the Community Trademark Register (SOLO Independent IP Practitioners) No strange aroma, but will Longkou Fen Si pass the test? [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 2:51 am by SHG
  Via Ashby Jones at the WSJ. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 8:01 am by Matthew Tokson
Their primary argument is based on the recent Supreme Court case Carpenter v. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 4:40 am by Ben
”Herein, it seems important to discuss the case of Keep Thomson v. [read post]
24 May 2020, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
The issue of readers flouting copyright was highlighted last month when Guardian columnist Owen Jones used his Twitter feed to publish almost an entire Sunday Times investigation into the UK government’s handling of the Covid-19 crisis. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:49 pm by Bexis
May 19, 2003) (applying California law).ConnecticutLevesque v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 9:08 am by John Elwood
United States, 17-6054, Jones v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 12:31 am
This approach was on display during the dense and complex arguments in Samantar v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 12:01 pm
Jones, No. 07-5994 In a prosecution for firearm possession by a felon, the District Court's order suppressing evidence is reversed, where the District Court, in assessing whether the officers who arrested Defendant had reasonable suspicion, erred by failing to take into account all information observed by the officers until Defendant yielded to unambiguous police authority. . [read post]