Search for: "Cash v. Cash" Results 1041 - 1060 of 8,555
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Oct 2021, 3:36 pm by Richard Hunt
Both National Federation for the Blind v Walmart  and Dalton v Kwik Trip concerned self checkout kiosks that included a cash back option. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 5:21 am by Patrick Bracher (ZA)
[Viva Life Insurance Limited v The Prudential Authority Financial Services Tribunal case number: PA2/2021 (13 October 2021)] [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 2:14 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Northwestern University, 953 F.3d 980 (7th Cir. 2020), cert. granted sub nom., Hughes v. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 1:13 pm by Eugene Volokh
Saying "The indictment said that P stole money from petty cash" or "The civil complaint said that P stole money from petty cash" isn't libelous, even if P didn't steal the money, so long as the summary of the legal documents is full, fair, and accurate.[17] But saying "The indictment said that P stole money from petty cash," but omitting P's acquittal, is no longer a "full and fair" report, precisely because it omits… [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 7:29 am
DocName=075000050HPt%2E+V&ActID=2086&ChapterID=59&SeqStart=6200000&SeqEnd=8675000 [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 4:54 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Tradesman Program Managers LLC v Doyle, 2020 NY Slip Op 32452[U] [Sup Ct, Kings County 2020]; Barrison v D’Amato & Lynch, LLP, 2019 NY Slip Op 30905[U] [Sup Ct, NY County]; Lentini v 219 W. 20th St. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 7:29 am by Christopher J. Willis
It also argued that the reasoning in the Supreme Court’s decision in Collins v Yellen provided an independent basis for denying the relief sought by RD Legal—invalidating the enforcement action. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 4:41 am by Peter J. Sluka
“Stay away” settlement agreements like this one have some obvious appeal: they satisfy (and silence) the outspoken shareholder without requiring the company to immediately come up with the cash that a buyout would require. [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 9:08 pm by Jasmine Wang
Supreme Court’s decision in Roe v. [read post]