Search for: "Charles v. United States Government"
Results 1041 - 1060
of 1,332
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2012, 1:52 am
“We are under a Constitution, but the Constitution is what the judges say it is… “-- Charles Evans Hughes, 11th Chief Justice of the United States.[1]ADNAN M L KARIMBarrister-at-Law The Supreme Court has declared the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution illegal and void ab initio; condemning military rules in explicit language[2]. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 12:30 pm
Ghanaian man comes to the United States on an F-1 visa, which allows him to stay in the country as long as he's enrolled in an approved educational institution. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 9:28 am
United States, by a vote of six to three, the Court held that a federal district court has the discretion to order a federal criminal sentence to run after a state criminal sentence that is anticipated but has not yet been imposed. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 12:12 pm
In this article the case of McCulloch v. [read post]
27 Nov 2009, 11:40 am
Polanski should be returned to the United States. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 7:00 am
The United States and Kuwait agreed on a plan to reflag 11 vessels as American. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm
Although the Supreme Court ruled DOMA unconstitutional in United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm
A federal judge struck down Justice Department policies that made it harder for victims of violence to seek asylum in the United States. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 7:02 am
Upon his criminal conviction, the United States expected to seize whatever was left of his wealth. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 7:02 am
Upon his criminal conviction, the United States expected to seize whatever was left of his wealth. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:45 pm
And tomorrow, Thursday, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 6:00 am
United States et al., Civil Action 02-2010, United States District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 4:51 am
” Volokh thinks DiRosa’s post—even if it advocates murder—advocates murder at some indefinite future time, making it protected speech pursuant to a pair of United States Supreme Court decisions—Brandenburg v. [read post]
5 May 2008, 1:12 pm
According to the petition, Yang had a “vocal confrontation with . . . officials” at the hospital, but he ultimately “managed to escape” and fled to the United States on a fake passport. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 10:00 pm
"Simply put, these structural dynamics will tend to recreate the difficulties seen in the context of nationwide class action litigation within the United States. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 11:00 pm
And publication of false information is generally protected by the First Amendment, unless it falls into one of the defined exceptions.[3] We cannot, legally, require the same duty of candor for discourse outside of the formal legal environment, including the conduct of political campaigns, or for professional journalism.[4] There is a cognizable government interest in such a restriction on speech, given the volume and impact of misinformation spread through information… [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm
Maryland and United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 8:30 am
During his time as a teacher he has also argued a number of major cases in state and federal courts, most notably Daubert v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 3:13 am
Republicans immediately promised to repeal it, with one Congressman vowing to “meet the federal government at the state line to keep them from mandating this bill upon us. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 10:38 am
Martinez (2010); Seth Waxman and Ted Olson in Citizens United v. [read post]
