Search for: "Consumer Healthcare Products Association"
Results 1041 - 1060
of 1,149
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2009, 10:45 am
It is illegal for any one entity to corner the market of any product or service. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 4:31 am
The Healthcare Association of New York and the Greater New York Hospital Association are fighting the legislation. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 10:43 am
"These provisions are anti-science and anti-consumer," said Dr. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 10:34 am
" A nurse gives practice tips about advising patients regarding CAM: Abstract Mantle F (2009) The risks associated with consumer magazines giving advice on complementary therapies. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 9:23 am
Its review recommended labels on those products warning of the greater risk. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 6:23 am
According to a report released by the American Hospital Association in 2007, U.S. hospitals need approximately 116,000 nurses to fill vacant positions nationwide, meaning that a national registered nurse vacancy rate of 8.1 percent. [27] Furthermore, the demand for registered nurses is expected to grow by 2 percent to 3 percent each year.[28] D. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 8:35 am
The traditional notions of consumer protection, based on the presumption in favour of caveat emptor, are entirely inadequate in the field of medicine. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 6:05 am
Good to see the folks at McNeil Consumer Healthcare taking a pro-active stance. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 6:00 am
To identify the worst insurance companies for consumers I suggest that one review The American Association for Justice report entitled "The Ten Worst Insurance Companies of America. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 2:42 am
Governor Time Pawlenty (R-MN) recently outlined a set of proposed healthcare reforms to be considered during Minnesota's 2010 legislative session.One of these proposals would allow Minnesotans to purchase health insurance plans from other states. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 2:13 am
So what can the consumer do? [read post]
25 Oct 2009, 9:00 am
The complaint was filed in the Superior Court of New Jersey, where Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., is located. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 3:18 pm
Providing a standard for substantiation may also help to preserve consumer confidence in these products. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 4:24 am
§202.1(e)(4)(i)(a), including advertisements directed to health care professionals.And FDA regulations prohibit a manufacturer from "express[ing]" an "intent" or merely "know[ing]" or having "notice" that its product "is to be used" off-label. 21 C.F.R. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 12:20 am
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., 2:09-cv-04567, U.S. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 8:31 am
A review of these warranty supplements, however, indicates that patients are only being reimbursed up to $1,000 for out of pocket expenses associated with surgery and medical care necessitated by the defective product and that health insurers are left without recourse for the tens of thousands of dollars that they might be required to pay for medical care necessitated by the litany of defects associated with these pain pumps. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Finally, the Reese court invoked “important policy concerns” that weighed against allowing common-law claims asserting liability for failure to recall a legally-marketed product: Because the cost of locating, recalling, and replacing mass-marketed products can be enormous and will likely be passed on to consumers in the form of higher prices, the recall power should not be exercised without extensive consideration of its economic impact. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Finally, the Reese court invoked “important policy concerns” that weighed against allowing common-law claims asserting liability for failure to recall a legally-marketed product: Because the cost of locating, recalling, and replacing mass-marketed products can be enormous and will likely be passed on to consumers in the form of higher prices, the recall power should not be exercised without extensive consideration of its economic impact. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Finally, the Reese court invoked “important policy concerns” that weighed against allowing common-law claims asserting liability for failure to recall a legally-marketed product: Because the cost of locating, recalling, and replacing mass-marketed products can be enormous and will likely be passed on to consumers in the form of higher prices, the recall power should not be exercised without extensive consideration of its economic impact. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:09 am
Under our products liability jurisprudence, a manufacturer's duty to implement alternative safer designs is limited to the time the product is manufactured, not months or years later when technology or knowledge may have changed.2009 WL 2951299, at *3 (citation omitted).Reese also followed the Restatement (Third) of Torts, Products Liability §11 (1997), which rejects duty to recall claims unless a government-mandated or voluntarily undertaken… [read post]
