Search for: "Cost v. Cost" Results 1041 - 1060 of 48,938
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2024, 12:25 pm by Lawrence Solum
  Here is the abstract: Fifty years ago, the Supreme Court decided, in San Antonio Independent School District v. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 5:00 am by Vincent Joralemon
  In response, policymakers will need to continue to conduct balanced cost-benefit analyses based on the spectrum of public influence campaigns: If companies with a vested interest want to lobby for a particular rule extension, they should do so. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 9:03 pm by renholding
Companies will be required to disclose capitalized costs, expenses, charges, and losses as a result of such events. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
” This is precisely what the Supreme Court called for in TSC Industries v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 4:59 pm by INFORRM
  The claimant is awarded his costs of the application which are very substantial. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 1:57 pm by NARF
H.R.7516 - To amend the Indian Health Care Improvement Act to address liability for payment of charges or costs associated with provision of purchased/referred care services, and for other purposes. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 12:42 pm by Goldfinger Injury Lawyers
Significantly decreasing the Plaintiff’s claim for costs in such circumstances risks rewarding Defendants who engage in such bully tactics: Persampieri v Hobbs, 2018 ONSC 368, at paras 93-108 (where Aviva was also the defending insurer); Corbett v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 10:44 am by Eric Fruits
These stations rightly saw CATV providing “out of market” signals as competition for viewers and advertising, as discussed in Carter Mountain Transmission Corp. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 5:59 am by Satya Marar
Supreme Court confirmed the legality of Amex’s restraints on steering customers in the 2018 American Express v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 4:56 pm by INFORRM
  Those have been traditionally considered to be almost unavailable (under the rule in Bonnard v Perryman) but there are judicial stirrings that this may be old law. [read post]