Search for: "Crawford v. State"
Results 1041 - 1060
of 1,617
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2009, 3:52 pm
Rachel Pickering won in State v. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 1:25 am
1st_Circuit_seal.png First Circuit vacates and remands conviction based on Confrontation Clause violation under Crawford; during the investigating agent's trial testimony, details were elicited about the statements made by the defendant's non-testifying accomplices (who confessed and pled out before trial) which described the defendant's role in the crime, provided no insight into the course of the investigation and was used by the prosecution as proof of… [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 5:33 pm
In the case of State v. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 5:44 pm
By contrast, in People v Bush (2009 NY Slip Op 07066 [4th Dept 10/2/09]) the Court held thatContrary to the contention of defendant, his right of confrontation was not violated by the admission in evidence of a certified abstract of a registration record of the New York State Department of Motor Vehicles. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 1:35 pm
The State of Michigan has sought certiorari from the Michigan Supreme Court’s recent 4-3 favorable Crawford in People v Bryant, 483 Mich 132; 768 NW2d 65 (2009). [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 10:11 am
See San Saba Energy, L.P. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 2:34 am
Sixth Circuit SEAL.gif Another circuit finds a statement against interest under FRE 804(b)(3) is non-testimonial; Cooperating witness's tape recording of co-defendant bragging to other inmates about his and the defendant's role in the charged robbery was non-testimonial because "a reasonable person in the declarant's [co-defendant's] position" would not anticipate his statement being used against the defendant in investigating and prosecuting the… [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 8:46 pm
Supreme Court of Crawford v. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 3:08 am
Massachusetts, in which the Court held that laboratory reports were “testimonial” within the meaning of Crawford v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 11:55 am
How closely do you need to read Crawford v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 3:14 am
The saga of State v. [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 11:03 pm
Part V will be the conclusion. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 5:48 am
A three-judge panel of the Indiana Court of Appeals unanimously struck down a state voter ID law previously upheld by the United States Supreme Court in Crawford v. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 3:23 am
Crawford receives much better treatment in the 8th District’s decision in State v. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 6:00 am
" Citing a recent Seventh Circuit opinion - and the Court's affirmation of it - in the voter identification case Crawford v. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 3:30 am
The Ohio Supreme Court recognized that 30 years ago in State v. [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 8:09 am
Defendant objected on the basis that Crawford v. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 8:46 am
Interestingly, I raised that issue again at trial in United States v. [read post]
