Search for: "Defendants A-F" Results 1041 - 1060 of 29,809
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2012, 8:56 pm by Edward X. Clinton, Jr.
Rule 4(m) itself does not specify any factors to evaluate the relative hardships, but courts in this circuit have considered whether:(1) a new suit would be barred by statute of limitations,(2) the defendant will be prejudiced by the delay in service,(3) the defendant had actual notice of a lawsuit within a short time after the attempted service,(4) the defendant evaded service,(5) the defendant was eventually served,(6) the plaintiff ever requested an extension… [read post]
25 May 2007, 6:27 am
The district court granted defendant's suppression motion because the defendant would not feel detained, seizing on one word of the officer's statement to the defendant. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 6:00 am by Rebecca Tushnet
., --- F.3d ----, 2011 WL 3477188 (8th Cir.) 3M sued Inspired for false advertising of Inspired’s Frog Tape/claims about 3M tape under the Lanham Act and Minnesota state law. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 5:35 pm by Robert Chesney, Steve Vladeck
JASTA litigation: an update on the first district court rulings dealing with the impact of JASTA on the suit brought by 9/11-related families vs various Saudi defendants. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 5:42 pm
The latest annual report (Geschäftsbericht, in German, or here in English; SEC Form 20-F filing) details three such proceedings (report from p.194 (210 of 237); form from p.95). [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 8:01 am
Moran, 482 F.3d 1101 (9th Cir. 2007) (per curiam) In introducing electronic evidence, such as the contents of records from a computer, any statements remain subject to the hearsay rules. [read post]