Search for: "Doe v Great Expectations" Results 1041 - 1060 of 3,541
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2009, 4:07 am
" Id. at *9 (technically this is dictum since the court did not need to decide the issue, given the first ruling).That the RICO statute lacks a separate reliance requirement does not mean that reliance isn't essential to causation in the great bulk of RICO cases. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 3:35 am by SHG
  Does this solve the problem? [read post]
15 May 2019, 7:29 am
Birss J reminds us that "just because a claimant has obtained some relief, it does not mean that they are necessarily always the real winner. [read post]
29 Jun 2019, 4:38 am
On the contrary, as aptly set out in the UK case of Sawkins v Hyperion [2005] EWCA Civ 565 (a country that traditionally envisaged originality as a low threshold and as requiring just skill, labour or effort):A work may be complete rubbish and utterly worthless, but copyright protection may be available for it, just as it is for the great masterpieces of imaginative literature, art and music. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:29 am by Eugene Volokh
Note that the brief has not yet been cite-checked, and I expect to do more editing and proofreading even apart from the suggestions I get from you folks and others. [read post]