Search for: "Doe v. Attorney General" Results 1041 - 1060 of 20,991
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
It's available for free to Justia members; attorneys (but alas, not the general non-lawyer public) can become members for free. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 4:44 pm by Mark Walsh
Johnson later famously nominated Ramsay Clark as attorney general when he wanted to prod the elder Clark to retire from the court and make way for a vacancy.) [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 5:40 am by Jacob Wirz
The decision is admittedly dry—it rejected a challenge brought by 26 states’ attorneys general to the Department of Labor’s 2022 Investment Duties Rule, which clarified the duties of fiduciaries to Employment Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) benefit plans concerning the selection of investments. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 11:54 am by David Kopel
[Amicus brief in Supreme Court's Second Amendment Rahimi case] This week amicus briefs were filed in United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 2:38 pm by John Elwood
The Farm Bureau and North Carolina Attorney General Josh Stein ask the court to grant review and reverse the 4th Circuit’s decision. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 7:50 am by Dan Farber
Q:  Could you give us a general sense of how the arguments in the three cases went? [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:41 am by Norman L. Eisen
Expand all Collapse all Relevant Court Proceedings United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 11:25 am by Dan Lopez
He is currently the Deputy Assistant Attorney General for the Antitrust Division with a focus on civil enforcement. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 8:56 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
The Attorney General has issued an intervening decision which might impact Mr. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 3:37 pm by Amy Howe
In an unusual twist, the state’s attorney general, Gentner Drummond, has supported one of Glossip’s petitions for review. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 1:51 am by INFORRM
The Attorney General has issued a contempt of court warning about publishing anything that could prejudice any future criminal investigation into Russell Brand. [read post]