Search for: "Doe v. Massachusetts Trial Court" Results 1041 - 1060 of 1,272
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2015, 7:40 pm
The executrix pleaded the six-year limitation statute which the Surrogate, in directing a trial upon the claim, held inapplicable. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 6:48 pm
The executrix pleaded the six-year limitation statute which the Surrogate, in directing a trial upon the claim, held inapplicable. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 11:20 am by Anna Christensen
LawhornDocket: 10-24Issue(s): Whether a state court’s determination that trial counsel’s waiver of a penalty-phase closing argument did not prejudice the defendant is “contrary to” Supreme Court precedent.Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (11th Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionPetitioners’ reply Title: Wilson v. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 9:34 pm
  They relied heavily on a 2006 decision by the state's highest court,  Hernandez v. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 8:53 am by Sean Wajert
  The trial court granted summary judgment to defendants, and plaintiff appealed. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 7:07 am by Mandelman
  Attorney Thomas Cox of Portland, Maine, who you may remember from the “GMAC uses robo-signers deposition” that brought foreclosures to a standstill last fall, says that in his opinion… “He (Judge Grossman) does the most thorough and competent analysis of the MERS charade that I have seen, basically concluding that the entire MERS business model does not comply with our laws, and that he will no longer accept MERS mortgage assignments in his… [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 6:03 am by Susan Brenner
Ct. 1109, 954 N.E.2d 591 (Massachusetts Court of Appeals 2011). [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 8:16 am by John Eastman
  As was noted by Chief Justice Margaret Marshall, of the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts and author of that Court’s 2003 decision in Goodridge v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:13 pm by John Elwood
Massachusetts, 12-7166, involves a Confrontation Clause claim that is likely being held for Chaidez v. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 12:54 pm by John Elwood
The developer won at trial, but the U.S. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 2:38 am by Russell Beck
Last month, however, a different Massachusetts judge went the other way in Invidia, LLC v. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 4:21 pm by Robert B. Milligan
Hartnett, a Massachusetts federal court held that initiating contact was not necessary for finding solicitation in breach of a customer non-solicitation agreement. [read post]