Search for: "Doe v. United States of America"
Results 1041 - 1060
of 4,684
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2013, 2:37 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently issued a decision in Novozymes v. [read post]
30 Jun 2018, 2:11 am
As does Mark Levin. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 4:44 pm
The defendants moved to dismiss Relator #2’s new qui tam on the grounds that a “common plaintiff, the United States of America, has filed two proper lawsuits . . . against the Defendants alleging identical claims” and thus should be dismissed pursuant to Rule 41(a).In dismissing Relator #2’s new qui tam, the Court found that the two dismissal rule applied because “[i]t is undisputed that a common plaintiff, the United States… [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 5:45 am
In Communications Workers of America, AFL-CIO v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 8:57 am
Supreme Court's March 2007 decision in Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. of America v. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 9:07 am
In R and A Synergy LLC v. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 9:07 am
In R and A Synergy LLC v. [read post]
24 Dec 2012, 9:51 am
In United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 3:00 am
Its first article provides that “[t]here shall be firm and enduring peace and sincere friendship between the United States of America and Iran. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 6:20 pm
Can you describe the differences between statutory law systems in the United States and the statutory codes of European states? [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 1:58 pm
[And yes, we realize that "The Americas" does not necessarily (and probably not even specifically in this case) mean "The United States of America" - but it's just not funny without the double-patriotism joke] Related posts:Firm Fight! [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 7:07 am
(in support of petitioners) Brief amicus curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America (in support of petitioners) [read post]
2 May 2014, 4:41 am
In an email Kidde sent inNovember 2010, [he] stated he could no longer work with Bergstein because Bank of America had put him on ChexSystems, which prevented him from opening a bank account anywhere in the United States. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 12:16 pm
Not surprisingly, the US government had concerns when signing the Convention in 1994, declaring then that “nothing in the Convention shall be deemed to require or to authorize legislation or other action by the United States of America incompatible with the provisions of the Constitution of the United States of America. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 12:16 pm
Not surprisingly, the US government had concerns when signing the Convention in 1994, declaring then that “nothing in the Convention shall be deemed to require or to authorize legislation or other action by the United States of America incompatible with the provisions of the Constitution of the United States of America. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 6:43 am
A United States 5th Circuit of Appeals case dealt with the "Anti-Technically" Statute recently. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 2:13 pm
United States (Wednesday, Dec. 5) This post was originally published at Howe on the Court. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 6:38 am
” This statement sounds very much like the interpretive principle underlying one of John Marshall’s most famous remarks in McCulloch v. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 6:25 am
See Doe v. [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 12:22 pm
In a decision that spoke somewhat tentatively about an “evolving understanding of the meaning of equality,” the Court in United States v. [read post]
