Search for: "Does 1 - 41"
Results 1041 - 1060
of 4,705
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2022, 5:38 am
Eventually, the Regional Court Munich declared the invalidity of the contested mark in Class 41. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 7:14 am
I see that Bush's "41" is #2. #1 is a children's book, as is much of the top-selling reading material. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 7:40 am
Let’s see what happened.BackgroundOn 21 April 2014, Smiley Miley, Inc. filed an application with the EUIPO to register the sign ‘MILEY CYRUS’ for goods and services in the following classes:Class 9, including musical sound recordings, music video recordings and downloadable multimedia files featuring music;Class 16, including printed material, posters and decals;Class 28, including video game controllers and game controllers; andClass 41, including entertainment services,… [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 6:55 am
Prince et al., 1:15-cv-10160. [read post]
1 May 2007, 4:11 pm
Update [2007-5-1 18:41:21 by Big Tent Democrat]: Dem Leaders will respond to the President now. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 8:37 am
Does Rule 803(8) trump other hearsay exceptions? [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 8:37 am
Does Rule 803(8) trump other hearsay exceptions? [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 10:14 am
§ 101(41). [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 1:37 am
In doing so, the Court should consider whether there is sufficiently clear and direct conceptual proximity between the figurative signs at issue and the PDO ‘Queso manchego’ (paras. 39-41). [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 7:05 am
This referral does not appear to be high on the EBA's priority list. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 12:06 pm
B.J., February 2012, at 41. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 1:36 am
Co. v Zuk, 78 NY2d 41, 46 [1991]). [read post]
15 May 2016, 1:58 pm
Applicant was refused registration for two marks: (1) JAWS in standard characters and (2) JAWS DEVOUR YOUR HUNGER in standard characters. [read post]
15 May 2016, 1:58 pm
Applicant was refused registration for two marks: (1) JAWS in standard characters and (2) JAWS DEVOUR YOUR HUNGER in standard characters. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 8:41 am
[Trademark Ordinance of 13th November 2019 that came into effect on 1st April 2020.] 1. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 6:44 am
At one point, they make sure to point out that they had the metadata and prosecutors didn’t, a mostly empty piece of chest-thumping considering that months earlier they were begging the same prosecutors to do them favors and share nonpublic documents and information (and also considering that acquiring metadata does not necessarily take savvy, sophistication, and high-tech tools). [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 9:59 pm
“Women’s empowerment must continue, but does the bad necessarily have to follow the good? [read post]
20 May 2019, 11:00 pm
Pursuant to Rule 99(1)(a) EPC, the notice of appeal shall contain inter alia the name and the address of the appellant as provided in Rule 41, paragraph 2(c).Rule 101(2) EPC further specifies that in case the Board of Appeal notes that the appeal does not comply with Rule 99(1)(a) EPC, it shall communicate this to the appellant and shall invite him to remedy the deficiencies within a period to be specified. [read post]
3 May 2021, 7:30 am
Nov. 1, 2019). [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 5:22 am
See Affidavit in Support of an Application for a Search Warrant [# 5–1] (sealed) at 1 (hereinafter Affidavit). [read post]
