Search for: "Does 1-39" Results 1041 - 1060 of 5,128
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2008, 11:14 am
  Probably not, however, where the employer asks for the information (directly or indirectly) and the candidate does not get the job or an interview, the employer may face a human rights complaint and will not be in a position to say "how could I have made my decision on a prohibited ground of discrimination, I didn't even know". [read post]
3 Jan 2007, 11:48 pm
What's the prosecution's strongest evidence? [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 9:13 am
The following are all lies by Rudy Giuliani: (1) Iran is not a nuclear threat, though they MAy become one [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 9:26 am
§ 29-34-208 (a), (c) & (d)* provides as follows:    (a) As used in this section: (1) “Possessor of real property” means the owner, lessee, renter, or other lawful occupant of real property; and (2) “Trespasser” means a person who enters or remains on the real property of another without actual or implied permission, or a person who engages in conduct that constitutes a criminal trespass offense under §§… [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 7:14 am by Josh
Cost: Free with 2 concurrent chats; $9 a month for 1 agent. $15 a month for 2 agents; $39 a month for 5 agents. [read post]
” The COE consists of 46 member states. 39 member states have ratified the convention, 6 members have signed but not yet ratified and 1 member has not signed at all. [read post]
15 Jul 2007, 6:06 am
The tax on cigarettes would rise to $1 a pack, from the current 39 cents....White House officials said the president had several other reasons [besides the fact that the proposed legislation would raise cigarette taxes to $1/pack] to veto the bipartisan Senate plan. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 5:11 am
Update: 11/14 1:30 pm: Comcast has redeemed itself. [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 3:47 am by Eleonora Rosati
 The EUIPO examiner refused registration on grounds that the sign applied for would be contrary to ‘accepted principles of morality’ under Article 7(1)(f) EUTMR.The wording of this absolute ground, which cannot be overcome by, e.g., inherent or acquired distinctiveness of the sign at hand, states that:1. [read post]
22 Mar 2009, 5:23 am
While the trial court was considering the property owners' objections to that taking, the County filed a second taking against the same property owners in 2005 to take the same property it was already trying to take in the 2000 action (plus 1/2 acre more that the developer determined it needed). [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
The rule does not say (and does not need to say) what the consequence will be of an applicant not taking the opportunity to restrict the claims. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 5:15 pm by LindaMBeale
  See Piketty & Saez, Income Inequality in the United States, 1913-1998, 118 Quarterly Journal of Economics 1-39 (2003) (tables updated to 2010 in excel format, March 2012, and available at Saez website, here). [read post]