Search for: "Does 1-54" Results 1041 - 1060 of 3,411
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2019, 7:31 pm by Josh Blackman
Judges Ho and Andrew wrote a joint dissent, which was joined by Judge Smith (see pp. 54-64). [read post]
17 Aug 2019, 11:56 am by Robert Liles
”[1] It is important to keep in mind that the specific credentialing requirements and procedures used vary from one payor to another. [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 9:51 am by Giles Peaker
There are certain exceptions, including at s.113(3)(a), which states that subsection (1) does not prevent “a claim for judicial review”. [read post]
  As a result, the employer disciplined 54 of the participating employees for having violated the employer’s attendance policy. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 1:19 am by Selin Sinem Erciyas
The rights of establishments on data, which are the most valuable business products, are under protection in accordance with Article 54 and Articles 55/1(c), Article 55/1(d) and Article 55/1(e) of Turkish Commercial Code (TCC), along with the general provisions, protecting property right. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 5:00 am by Monica M. Ruiz, David Forscey
On March 1, 2018, the governor of Colorado issued the first-ever state emergency declaration based on a ransomware attack. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 10:26 am by Hadley Baker, Mikhaila Fogel
This list does include the president’s written responses to Mueller’s questions, which are included in Appendix C of the report. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 6:30 am by Kristyn Shea
  As the number of women in the military increases, so does the number of women veterans. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 6:30 am by Kristyn Shea
  As the number of women in the military increases, so does the number of women veterans. [read post]
13 Jul 2019, 2:50 pm by Guest Blogger
  In 2014 men with criminal records accounted for about 34% of all non-working men ages 25-54. [read post]
4 Jul 2019, 8:22 pm
 54(4)(a) does not apply.[26]        The exception in s. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 11:44 pm by Roel van Woudenberg
If G 1/18 is applicable, but the case is not stayed as the outcome on the merits of the appeal does not change, can a decision on the reimbursement/refund be made without staying in view of the relevance of G 1/18 on that decision (esp. as refund is not at the discretion of the EPO/Board)? [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 8:24 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Alberta (aff’d ABCA; leave to appeal to SCC refused) as justified under s. 1 [56] The objective of the age requirement is similarly clear if one considers that, in the absence of an age requirement, babies meeting the citizenship and residency requirements would be eligible to vote. [read post]