Search for: "English v. English" Results 1041 - 1060 of 11,206
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2010, 1:38 am
JSC argued, inter alia, that the English courts did not have jurisdiction to grant an injunction as it was not permissible to rely on either statute referred to above. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 1:38 am
JSC argued, inter alia, that the English courts did not have jurisdiction to grant an injunction as it was not permissible to rely on either statute referred to above. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 12:51 pm
Examining the Problematic Indian Discourse Joseph Mante, Arbitrability and public policy: an African perspective Leonardo V. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 5:28 am
They all have pretty pictures but none is in English. [read post]
24 Dec 2007, 4:44 am
Plaintiff commenced a libel action based on the article and editorial, and the Second Department denied defendant's motion to dismiss, in Matovcik v. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 2:24 pm
The issue was whether this is a temporary taking, or simply "normal" planning delay and therefore not compensable.Recall that in First English Evangelical Lutheran Church of Glendale v. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 6:45 am
In the case of Sugar Hut Group Ltd & Ors v Great Lakes Reinsurance (UK) Plc & Ors [2010] EWHC 2636 (Comm) Mr Justice Burton reaffirmed the English Court's approach to non-disclosure and breach of warranty.The defendants provided insurance cover to the claimants in respect of four nightclubs. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 1:15 pm by Donald Dinnie
The test enunciated by the English court in Kuwait Airways Corporation v Kuwait Insurance Co [1996] 1 Lloyds Rep 664, confirmed in Mann and Another v Lexington Insurance Company [2000] is no different in South African law. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 2:13 pm
This was established in Entores Ltd v Miles Far East Corporation [1955] EWCA Civ 3 and confirmed in Brinkibon Ltd v Stahag Stahl G.m.b.h. [1983] 2 AC 34 (both cases involving telexes). [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 2:33 am
Norris v Government of the United States of America House of Lords “A person could not be extradited to the United States of America to stand trial on charges brought under US legislation which declared cartels to be illegal, to stand trial for price-fixing offences alleged to have been committed from 1989 to 2000 because during that period price-fixing agreements and cartels were not illegal under English law, unless there were other aggravating features such as… [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 6:06 am by Amy Howe
  Lyle previewed the argument for this blog, while I did the same in Plain English. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 3:22 am by Amy Howe
All eyes are on next week’s oral arguments in King v. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 10:18 am by Dan Antoun
On 12 July 2016 the Supreme Court heard the appeal of Moreno v The Motor Insurers’ Bureau. [read post]