Search for: "Ex Parte March" Results 1041 - 1060 of 2,425
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2013, 1:01 pm
On January 22, Circuit Court Judge Diane Goodstein held an ex parte hearing (meaning a hearing held on an urgent basis, with less than the usual notice to the other side) on Bishop Lawrence's request for a temporary restraining order against ECUSA. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 12:35 pm by Michael Lowe
In March 2013, in the case of Ex Parte Junius Sereal (read the opinion here), the CCA wrote in its opinion: The DPS report shows that the lab technician who was solely responsible for testing the evidence in this case is the scientist found to have committed misconduct. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 2:00 am by Stefanie Levine
Patent No. 7,078,128 for cathode compositions for lithium-ion batteries (see ex parte Request No. (10)). [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 2:00 am by Stefanie Levine
Patent No. 7,078,128 for cathode compositions for lithium-ion batteries (see ex parte Request No. (10)). [read post]
10 Sep 2016, 6:47 pm by Rishabh Bhandari
” But Mark Miller, the head prosecutor, flags that a decision might need to be made between an in camera or ex parte discussion over AE92. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 12:36 am by Kluwer IP Reporter
During the conference March was repeatedly mentioned as a possible starting moment for the UPC. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 12:39 am by Kluwer IP Reporter
During the conference March was repeatedly mentioned as a possible starting moment for the UPC. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 7:13 am by Phil Dixon
Widespread pandemic closures and concerns were prevalent by March of that year. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 11:16 am
  (Ex parte Krampe, No. 2013-010784, PTAB Mar. 31, 2016)Details:Ex parte KrampeAppeal 2013-010784; Appl. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 11:16 am
  (Ex parte Krampe, No. 2013-010784, PTAB Mar. 31, 2016)Details:Ex parte KrampeAppeal 2013-010784; Appl. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 10:53 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
More than 250 IRS employees have spent over 100,000 hours as part of these investigations. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 4:15 am by Scott A. McKeown
Previously, when an inter partes or ex parte patent reexamination was the basis for the motion to stay the court proceeding, the strongest plaintiff arguments in opposition were that the significant USPTO delay would prove prejudicial to the plaintiff…not any more. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 5:00 am by Carrie Goldberg
They were told that if he resisted, that was part of the fantasy. [read post]