Search for: "Finger v. State"
Results 1041 - 1060
of 1,512
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2012, 1:22 pm
” United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 8:02 pm
Sorrell v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 8:01 pm
Sorrell v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 5:15 am
United States. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 5:33 am
New York is, like Pennsylvania and New Jersey, a Frye state (as in, Frye v United States, 293 F 1013) that permits “expert testimony based on scientific principles, procedures, or theories only after the principles, procedures, or theories have gained general acceptance in the relevant scientific field. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
(United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 12:04 pm
The Facts Behind Martel v. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 7:24 am
Corr v. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 3:00 am
State. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 5:10 pm
as Primary Sponsor Egan, Joseph V. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 4:00 am
The memo fingered Muoghalu, among others. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 11:52 am
In the recent case (Ornstein v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 7:34 pm
United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 2:08 am
In our view it follows from that state of affairs that Samsung has not established a prima facie case that the Leeper Article anticipates the touch panel claimed in claim 6 of the Touch Screen Patent. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 5:52 am
The Fitzpatrick study would count the Blessing v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 3:16 am
As this Court stated over 20 years ago, “[o]n numerous occasions, we have forcefully condemned prosecutorial cross-examination which compels a defendant to state that witnesses lied in their testimony” (People v Eldridge, 151 AD2d 966, 966, lv denied 74 NY2d 808). [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 2:16 pm
SC06-1237. - SMILEY v. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 3:48 am
Harry Blackmun had his epiphany back in 1994, in Callins v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 5:07 pm
Or just hunt up the person's v-card. [read post]
