Search for: "German v. State" Results 1041 - 1060 of 3,140
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2018, 2:13 pm
| Google cannot hide behind its algorithms, German court finds | Does the InfoSoc Directive envisage digital exhaustion? [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 7:15 am by David Hemming (Bristows)
The starting point for Mellor J’s analysis was Kitchin LJ’s judgment in Regeneron v Genentech [2013] EWCA Civ 93. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
” At the National Council of State Legislatures’ blog, Lisa Soronen looks at Nelson v. [read post]
24 Mar 2007, 9:50 pm
Since the landmark 1980 case of Filártiga v. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 10:00 am by ASAD KHAN
Who bears the evidential burden and the standard required for the burden to be discharged are germane questions. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
In a decision of 26 February 2015 (published in May), the German Bundesgerichtshof addresses the extent to which innovations in user interface design are patentable. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 6:30 am by Ashley Binetti
Escobar, and State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. [read post]
22 Mar 2022, 3:19 am by Jan von Hein
Lehmann: Locating Financial Loss and Collective Actions in Case of Defective Investor Information: The CJEU’s Judgment in VEB v BP For the first time, the CJEU has ruled in VEB v BP on the court competent for deciding liability suits regarding misinformation on the secondary securities market. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 2:26 pm by Eugene Volokh
On a motion by President Shrum, the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma dismissed the suit for lack of standing, ruling that the United States Supreme Court in Summers v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 4:28 pm by Maggie Sicklinger
  Google translator language detector indicated it’s a German word for Jesus. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 1:55 am
Hoffmann-La Roche AG and Genentech Inc. | Design v Copyright in Italy | Unitary patent and double patenting | Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc v Kymab Ltd & Anor | IKEA in Indonesia | Eli Lilly v Janssen Sciences.Never too late 83 [week ending on Sunday 14 February] – Indigenous IP | Arnold J's latest judgment flags down the iconic London black cab | Life of a national/EU trade mark ... in a map | A comprehensive… [read post]
8 May 2024, 5:17 am by Jan von Hein
Furthermore, the Romanian procedure cannot be considered compatible with EU law, as the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights X. and Y. v. [read post]