Search for: "Goodwill v. Goodwill"
Results 1041 - 1060
of 2,133
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2014, 10:25 am
In PhoneDog v. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 8:51 am
The Ninth Circuit is not kidding about not presuming irreparable harm in trademark cases.Titaness Light Shop, LLC v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 1:23 pm
Genex Cooperative, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 9:15 am
CFE Racing Products, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 4:38 am
That’s the question an Illinois federal court is going to answer in Brunner v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 1:46 pm
” Herb Reed Enterprises v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 5:51 am
The 9th Circuit’s most famous right of publicity case is White v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 4:24 am
Dryer v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 12:52 am
The goodwill element of passing off had not been established in relation to the names and that was enough to kill off the claim based on the names.* What about goodwill in CCC's logos? [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 10:54 am
In this Indiana copyright complaint, Brinker's accuses Rogers of "blatant and extreme violations of federal copyright and trade dress and unfair competition law and Indiana statutory and common law with regard to Brinker's intellectual property rights, business relationships, goodwill and business reputation. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 7:00 am
But the Supreme Court and many others have held that profit motive is not enough. [13] Moreover, the motivation behind Virgin Mobile’s Buzzfeed example may be less about the bottom line and more about building customer goodwill.[14] “Native content” as defined above is not an advertisement, does not refer to a specific product or service, and may not be solely motivated by economic factors. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 5:49 am
Paleteria La Michoacana, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 11:24 pm
The California Supreme Court in Edwards v. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 10:47 am
Ricks v. [read post]
6 Sep 2014, 11:04 am
Leiza Dolghih Attorney, Godwin Lewis PC The Texas Supreme Court in ExxonMobil Corp. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 4:01 am
Insurance Corporation of British Columbia v. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 2:29 pm
In the case of unregistered trademarks, you must prove that your name, logo, and tagline are actually trademarks, and that you own them; (v) registration serves as public notice that its owner has a claim to exclusivity of that mark; (vi) after 5 years of being registered, a trademark becomes incontestable, unless it was registered with knowledge of the prior rights of third parties; (vi) a registered trademark allows non-Canadian owners to register corresponding .CA domain names because it… [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 9:30 am
Hot Wax Inc. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2014, 9:49 am
Adell, et al. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 7:50 am
KravitzAn Update on PhoneDog v. [read post]
