Search for: "Grant v. State"
Results 1041 - 1060
of 61,038
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Nov 2012, 7:14 am
For advantages to be capable of being categorised as aid within the meaning of that Article , they must, first, be granted directly or indirectly through State resources, and, second, be imputable to the State (Case C‑303/88 Italy v Commission [1991]; Case C‑482/99 France v Commission [2002]; Case C-126/01 GEMO [2003]).The Court furthermore held that it followed from the wording of Art. 87(1) EC that only advantages granted directly… [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 2:47 pm
On Friday, CAAF granted review of this issue, but ordered no briefs:WHETHER, IN LIGHT OF THIS COURT'S DECISION IN UNITED STATES v. [read post]
1 May 2008, 9:02 am
State of Indiana was granted transfer yesterday, with opinion (see ILB entry here). [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 10:00 pm
In United States of America v. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 10:00 pm
In United States of America v. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 10:00 pm
In United States of America v. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 10:00 pm
In United States of America v. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 10:00 pm
In United States of America v. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 10:00 pm
In United States of America v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 6:52 pm
UNDER UNITED STATES v. [read post]
16 May 2024, 7:15 am
We are going to briefly examine each of […] The post Veterans v. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 11:01 pm
James Otero of the United States District Court for the Central District of California issued an opinion granting summary judgment for the defendant in UMG Recordings, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 9:45 am
Hood v. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 2:30 am
Following a stay and the decision in EN (Serbia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] EWCA Civ 630, which determined that the 2004 Order was unlawful, DN amended his judicial review proceedings to concentrate on the lawfulness of the detention. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 11:01 am
State Building and Construction Trades Council of California, AFL-CIO v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 8:23 am
United States, 429 U.S. 17 (1976); Keystone Driller Co. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 7:33 am
In Kastigar v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 4:56 pm
The case is Swarthout v. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 1:44 pm
Over the last several days I have heard of an alarming trend from the United States Patent and Trademark Office — Patent Examiners are canceling Notices of Allowance and yanking previously granted claims back into prosecution while citing the United States Supreme Court's ruling in Alice v. [read post]
