Search for: "Gray v. State"
Results 1041 - 1060
of 1,840
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2024, 6:11 pm
Here also is a map that summarizes this (from this article); the dark gray states are the ones where this sort of firing is most likely to be illegal: For a case bearing on whether government employers may fire employees for saying, after an assassination attempt on the President, "If they go for him again, I hope they get him," see Rankin v. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 4:08 pm
Inc. v Jersey Shore Chicken (GRAY On Claims)(Patently-O) CAFC: Refusing to stay preliminary relief pending appeal: Bushnell v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 3:11 am
Microsoft (Patently-O) (Patentology) (IPBiz) (Gray on Claims) CAFC clarifies meaning of ‘exclusive licensee’: WiAV Solutions v. [read post]
4 Oct 2024, 8:37 am
Wade and Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
Sidemans and Company Nigeria Limited v Calag Capital Limited (Afro-IP) Poland Personal circumstances in trade mark registration (Class 46) South Africa FIFA v Metcash trade mark case - Owen Dean's response (Afro-IP) South Africa 1 - Ambush Marketers 0: legal framework to help FIFA and 2010 World Cup sponsors protect their rights (Managing IP) Switzerland New developments in Swiss patent law (IP Frontline) Federal Administrative Court finds PARK AVENUE not descriptive for… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
Sidemans and Company Nigeria Limited v Calag Capital Limited (Afro-IP) Poland Personal circumstances in trade mark registration (Class 46) South Africa FIFA v Metcash trade mark case - Owen Dean's response (Afro-IP) South Africa 1 - Ambush Marketers 0: legal framework to help FIFA and 2010 World Cup sponsors protect their rights (Managing IP) Switzerland New developments in Swiss patent law (IP Frontline) Federal Administrative Court finds PARK AVENUE not descriptive for… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 5:46 am
Sidemans and Company Nigeria Limited v Calag Capital Limited (Afro-IP) Poland Personal circumstances in trade mark registration (Class 46) South Africa FIFA v Metcash trade mark case – Owen Dean’s response (Afro-IP) South Africa 1 – Ambush Marketers 0: legal framework to help FIFA and 2010 World Cup sponsors protect their rights (Managing IP) Switzerland New developments in Swiss patent law (IP Frontline) Federal… [read post]
27 Jan 2025, 9:00 pm
” He did so even though the question of whether the children of people not lawfully in the United States became citizens at birth was resolved more than 100 years ago.In United States v. [read post]
20 May 2009, 1:39 pm
Indiana State Police v. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 8:17 am
As any lawyer will tell you, eliminate the gray with a contract. [read post]
17 May 2009, 11:02 am
In Pro Football v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 10:37 am
Quantlab Technologies Ltd. v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 11:42 am
Supreme Court held in Star Athletica, LLC v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 2:20 am
(IP Dragon) Bridgestone v Bull – prior design defence in China (Class 99) Yao Ming wants to reign supreme over Yao Ming era (IP Dragon) An SME handbook for China. [read post]
23 May 2016, 11:35 am
But the way to answer them is not with a "cops-are-Nazis" festival, which -- thanks to an immature, political and grandstanding State's Attorney -- is what the Freddie Gray prosecutions have become. [read post]
13 Sep 2009, 5:38 pm
Lapine v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 10:53 am
(Roe’s companion, Doe v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 1:47 pm
Texas Data v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 3:23 am
: Catnic Components Ltd & Anor v Hill and Smith Ltd (Spicy IP) United States US Patents BPAI rules for ex parte appeals: Request for comment and notice of roundtable (Patently-O) Bilski and Warsaw share insights (AwakenIP) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: False marking statute applies on a per article basis: Forest Group, Inc v Bon Tool Co (GRAY On Claims) (EPLAW) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) You say tomato... [read post]
11 Jan 2025, 9:05 am
Gray, 62 So. 2d 597 (Fla. 1953). [read post]
