Search for: "HAMILTON v. THE STATE" Results 1041 - 1060 of 2,375
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2016, 1:29 pm by Sandy Levinson
  (This is why Hamilton chose Jefferson over the man without principles, Aaron Burr.) [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:19 am
Karp, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, on Tuesday, May 31, 2016 Tags: Broker-dealers, Exchange Act, Financial institutions, Jurisdiction, Liability standards, Regulation SHO, SEC,Shareholder suits, Shareholder voting, Short sales, State law, Supreme Court, U.S. federal courts Holding Activists and Proxy Advisory Firms Accountable? [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 5:12 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In Stein, the Sixth Circuit stated that IndyMac represented “the more cogent and persuasive rule. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 6:45 am by MBettman
  Scott Heenan, for the Hamilton County Prosecutor’s Office, got up and conceded that all of the state’s arguments (which you can read in the oral argument preview here) had been addressed by the court’s recent decision in State v. [read post]
31 May 2016, 3:52 am by Amy Howe
’” At Hamilton and Griffin on Rights, Angela Morrison analyzes the Court’s decision in Green v. [read post]
30 May 2016, 9:02 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Of course, that isn’t the standard under local, state, or federal antidiscrimination laws. [read post]
26 May 2016, 4:01 am by Amy Howe
”    Briefly: At Hamilton and Griffin on Rights, Angela Morrison weighs in on the Court’s recent decision in CRST Van Expedited v. [read post]
20 May 2016, 7:20 am by Amy Howe
And in Luna Torres v. [read post]
20 May 2016, 6:45 am
McLaughlin and Yafit Cohn, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, on Friday, May 13, 2016 Tags: Acquisition agreements, Contracts, Corporate fraud, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Due diligence, Fair values,Fairness review, Liability standards, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, Reliance Genuine Parts Co. v. [read post]
6 May 2016, 12:30 pm
Hamilton, 310 S.W.3d 476, 516 (Tex. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 5:21 am by John Elwood
Hamilton Bank of Johnson City barring property owners from filing a federal takings claim in federal court until they exhaust state court remedies, when this rule results in numerous jurisdictional “anomalies” and has a “dramatic” negative impact on takings law under San Remo Hotel, L.P. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 3:37 am by Amy Howe
” At Medium, David Leopold considers what a four-four tie in United States v. [read post]