Search for: "HOWARD v. STATE" Results 1041 - 1060 of 2,885
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2023, 4:28 am by Mark Graber
  Senator Jacob Howard of Michigan asserted, “where a person has taken a solemn oath to support the Constitution of the United States there is a fair moral implication that he cannot afterward commit an act which in its effect would destroy the Constitution of the United States without incurring the guilt of at least moral perjury. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 8:03 am by Ashby Jones
From where we sit, the most interesting component of the most interesting Supreme Court case of the term — McDonald v. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 3:06 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Kupplungbau GmbH v Lerner, 166 AD2d 505, 506 [1990]; see Schrull v Weis, 166 AD3d at 831). [read post]
3 Apr 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
  He was teaching English at Howard University when the United States entered the First World War in 1917. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 11:09 pm by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) The Third Circuit has handed down an interesting Second Amendment decision, United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 8:41 am by Roy Black
Jones) or third party business records (US v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 9:37 am by bryannewland
A panel of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals issued a decision yesterday in Big Lagoon Rancheria v. [read post]
25 May 2007, 3:28 pm
UPDATE: The D.C. government's motion for a stay indicates that an appeal to the Supreme Court would include these questions: "(1) whether the [Circuit Court] panel decision conflicts with the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 7:29 am by Amy Howe
” At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman weighs in on comments by Justice Scalia (and criticism thereof) on the Court’s opinion striking down state bans on same-sex marriage. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 3:17 am by Amy Howe
In an op-ed for the Los Angeles Times, Nicholas Stephanopoulos looks at the effect that the Court’s decision in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
15 Nov 2006, 10:11 am
The discussion of the state court's holding on presidential powers begins on page 15 of the main opinion linked by Howard.) [read post]