Search for: "Hall v. Hall"
Results 1041 - 1060
of 6,392
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2020, 4:41 pm
Nevertheless, notwithstanding the approach adopted by large search engines to date, name-based searches are only a “particular” (GC et. al. v CNIL at [46]) rather than the only example of processing which clearly satisfies the first threshold. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 9:39 am
In United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 3:36 pm
Hall & Mark David Hall eds., Indianapolis, Liberty Fund 2007); see also Stinneford, supra, at 1769. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 7:24 am
In an already tight labor market, the court’s decision in United Union of Roofers, Waterproofers and Allied Workers, Local Union No. 37 v. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 11:11 am
Editor's Note: This post contains the text of a speech that former Secretary of Homeland Security Jeh Johnson delivered on Feb. 6 at the American Constitution Society (ACS) Symposium at the Georgetown University Law Center. *** I am happy to be part of this symposium. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
In Shurtleff v. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 10:49 am
Since 2015 when the Second Circuit Court of Appeals decided Cheeks v. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 7:15 am
March 18, 3:40-4:30 PM, America's Health Insurance Plans, National Health Policy Conference: Panel on "Texas v. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 12:41 pm
Yet, that presumption lies at the foundation of our criminal justice system, requiring trial courts to instruct juries about the presumption without minimizing its importance (see CPL § 300.10[2]; People v Hall, 155 AD2d 344, 346-347 [1st Dept 1989]). [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 6:00 am
Supreme Court’s South Dakota v. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 6:00 am
Supreme Court’s South Dakota v. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 9:30 pm
Georgia v. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 10:11 am
In Gonzaga University v. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 5:56 am
The Appellate Division unanimously affirmed the lower court's ruling, citing Jennings v New York State Office of Mental Health, 786 F Supp 376.In Jennings the court opined that "[t]he gender-based assignment policy strikes a balance between the patients' privacy interests and the right of Security Hospital Treatment Assist ands [SHTA] to bid for [the] position," explaining that the requirement that at least one SHTA of the same gender as the patients be assigned to the… [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 5:56 am
The Appellate Division unanimously affirmed the lower court's ruling, citing Jennings v New York State Office of Mental Health, 786 F Supp 376.In Jennings the court opined that "[t]he gender-based assignment policy strikes a balance between the patients' privacy interests and the right of Security Hospital Treatment Assist ands [SHTA] to bid for [the] position," explaining that the requirement that at least one SHTA of the same gender as the patients be assigned to the… [read post]
26 Jan 2020, 11:03 am
The squash court formed part of the resort’s recreation hall. [read post]
25 Jan 2020, 3:45 pm
From Doe v. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 8:07 am
See, e.g., Martinez v. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 7:06 am
The new rule announced in Hurst v. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 8:21 am
He cited a 2014 ruling from the Appellate Division, Comando v. [read post]
