Search for: "Held v. State"
Results 1041 - 1060
of 82,121
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2007, 10:36 am
Reviewing the trial court's grant of the governmental entities' motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim, the Court of Appeals held that the Circuit Court for Baltimore City was correct as a matter of law when it found that the state-created danger theory did not apply in Maryland or, even if applicable, did not apply under the circumstances of the case and that a special relationship did not exist between the appellees and the Dawson family. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 7:40 am
Circuit issued its decision in United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 3:48 pm
(Orin Kerr) I’ve blogged a few times about the recent Ninth Circuit decision in United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 7:34 am
Hollinger v. [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 4:16 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 4:54 pm
The Michigan Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Adair v. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 1:06 pm
Since Sherwood I, two California state courts of appeal have reached the opposite conclusion and held that assignees can bring preference actions under California law because the Bankruptcy Code does not preempt state preference law. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 1:06 pm
Since Sherwood I, two California state courts of appeal have reached the opposite conclusion and held that assignees can bring preference actions under California law because the Bankruptcy Code does not preempt state preference law. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 3:51 pm
On May 13, 2013 the Supreme Court announced its decision in Dan’s City Used Cars v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 10:38 pm
On Wednesday, February 20, 2019, the United States Supreme Court held, in Timbs v. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 7:25 am
It is hard to believe that nearly five months have passed since the United States Supreme Court issued its landmark decision in United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2019, 3:50 pm
S. 83; Brooke v. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 6:54 am
In Heckler v Cheney, the Supreme Court held in 1985 that "an agency's decision not to prosecute or enforce...is a decision generally committed to an agency's absolute discretion". [read post]
15 Jun 2019, 12:21 am
"One cannot be held liable under a contract to which he or she is not a party" (Victory State Bank v EMBA Hylan, LLC, 169 AD3d 963, 965; see Maki v Travelers Cos., Inc., 145 AD3d 1228, 1230; 1911 Richmond Ave. [read post]
20 Mar 2025, 6:00 am
In Hungary v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 10:17 am
Court of Appeals emphasized once again in Adam Ortberg v. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 12:47 pm
Aristocrat v. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 10:14 am
State v. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 10:20 am
Here is the opinion in South Point Energy Center LLC v. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 1:27 pm
On July 5, 2016, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in State v. [read post]
