Search for: "Hoffman v. Hoffman"
Results 1041 - 1060
of 1,632
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2011, 2:57 pm
The opinion dismisses Smallwood's overbreadth argument with a quote from Village of Hoffman Estates v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 11:17 am
Co. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2011, 1:42 pm
There will always be a penumbral area where views may reasonably differ, said Lord Hoffman and Dame Arden.In his opinion in Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs v William Grant & Sons Distillers Limited, Lord Hoffmann said that, although the requirement that the initial computation must give a true and fair view involves the application of a legal standard, the courts are guided as to its content by the expert opinions of accountants as to what the best current accounting… [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 10:06 am
X v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 8:36 am
The CA could not help observing that Flaux J “found himself unable to follow” observations of Lord Hoffman in R v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 4:04 am
Williams v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 1:20 pm
In Hoffman v Colleluori 2011 NY Slip Op 05669 Decided on June 28, 2011 ; Appellate Division, Second Department we see the AD calculating the statute of limitations for plaintiff, and his ability to sue. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 7:56 am
Grama (Purdue IT), David Hoffman (Intel), Lance Hoffman (GWU Computer Science), Joanne McNabb (Cal Dept. of Consumer Affairs), Lisa S. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 10:55 pm
Whilst appeal by way of judicial review can be sufficient to satisfy Article 6, as Lord Hoffman stated in R(Begum) v Tower Hamlets London Borough Council, the initial decision-making process needs to be “fair” at the very least. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 7:03 pm
See Hoffman v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 10:10 am
However the CPS guidance quotes "DPP v McKeown, DPP v Jones ([1997] 2Cr App R, 155, HL at page 163) [where] Lord Hoffman defined a computer as "a device for storing, processing and retrieving information". [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 11:55 am
Supreme Court in Sorrell v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 2:21 am
Pharmacia & Upjohn in liquidazione and Pfizer Italia s.r.l (Kluwer Patent Blog) US: IPO releases list of top 300 patent holders for 2010 (Patent Docs) US: Supreme Court to hear more patent cases in October 2011 term: Mayo v Prometheus; Kappos v Hyatt; Caraco v Novo Nordisk (Inventive Step) US: In pleading inequitable conduct, inventor’s citation to withheld reference does not establish knowledge of reference sufficient to satisfy FRCP 9(b): Fred Hutchinson Cancer… [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 4:07 am
Network v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 11:56 am
Smith won in State v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 4:52 am
The court distinguished the Doe 1 v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 6:37 pm
Hoffman, 318 U.S. 109, 112 (1943). [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 11:40 pm
Supreme Court released its decision today in Sorrell v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 8:26 am
Lord Hoffman was far more critical in his 2009 lecture to the Judicial Studies Board. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 12:50 am
Second, and giving all appropriate weight to what was said in R (C (A Minor)) v Secretary of State for Justice [2008] EWCA Civ 882, [2009] QB 657, and E v Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary and another (Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission and others intervening) [2008] UKHL 66, [2009] 1 AC 536, the circumstan [read post]
