Search for: "I. C. "
Results 1041 - 1060
of 55,205
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2015, 9:29 pm
CASE: I-485 Based on Approved I-140 / National Interest Waiver CLIENT: Honduran LOCATION: Washington, D.C. [read post]
14 May 2025, 5:18 am
I don't like it. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 10:29 am
The Court concluded that using a fake name and misrepresented his identity violated SCR 20:8.4(c). [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 6:36 am
How do I check for a Class “C” misdemeanor warrant in Houston? [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 4:58 am
Ross similarly involved a 29(C) motion. [read post]
6 Oct 2012, 3:29 am
” This matches the evidentiary expectations of 4(c)(i). [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 3:37 am
C-” I’d say it’s more a question of whether the fix is in. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 4:50 am
The hearings on the Online News Act – Bill C-18 – wrapped up last week with a final session in which I had the unexpected opportunity to appear and again raise concerns with the bill. [read post]
30 Mar 2007, 1:43 pm
Charney: S&C Waved Its Nazi Past [Gay City News] The Latest Charney Sensation [Leonard Link] [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 5:00 am
Last week, I appeared before the committee, making the case that the process is need of fixing and the bill in need of reform. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 4:55 am
– My Bill C-11 Appearance at the CRTC appeared first on Michael Geist. [read post]
5 Sep 2024, 1:00 am
I mentioned last summer that OpenAI (c)(3) is looking to shed its tax-exempt cocoon or skin, as the case may be. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 11:27 am
(Rule 506(c) is another story; I expect that to be wildly successful.)... [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 1:07 am
When I get the chance, I like to watch Prime Minister's question time on C-Span. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 12:29 pm
It's my week to post, but b/c I won't be in the office the rest of the week, I will post early next week. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 5:33 am
One of those people is David C. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 1:25 pm
c? [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 3:52 pm
I am optimistic of the role of legal tools, both soft ones and positive ones, to shift the conversation and, over time, make our society more inclusive. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:54 am
Most people misassume that 512(c) eliminates all liability for user-caused copyright infringement, but it only eliminates damages and limits the scope of injunctive relief in 512(j)--but a court can still issue an injunction. 512(j) is, as far as I know, not been litigated, and frankly I don't understand all of its provisions. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 3:36 pm
From Parker C. [read post]
