Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF: A. C., A CHILD" Results 1041 - 1060 of 4,773
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2020, 10:09 am by Eugene Volokh
§ 501(a)(1), a person seeking to be adjudicated a de facto parent needs to prove the following by clear and convincing evidence: (A) the person resided with the child as a regular member of the child's household for a significant period of time; (B) the person engaged in consistent caretaking of the child; (C) the person undertook full and permanent responsibilities of a parent of the child without expectation of financial compensation; (D) the… [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 6:28 am by Jacquelyn Greene
If you are age 18 or older and have personal experience with the North Carolina juvenile justice or child welfare system, or both, and you want to talk with us about participating in this project, please complete this interest form. [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 8:29 am by Elizabeth Kruska
The seven factors are a lot to prove: A) petitioner resided with child for significant time; B) engaged in caretaking of child; C) undertook full and permanent responsibilities of child; D) held out the child as their own; E) established bonded and dependent relationship with child that was parental in nature; F) the other parent(s) supported that bonded relationship; and G) continuing that parental relationship is in the best interest… [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 7:01 pm by Gregory Forman
” Following trial, the family court issued an order granting a divorce on the grounds of one year’s continuous separation, awarding Wife custody of the children, dividing the marital estate 50/50, denying alimony, and awarding child support in a lump sum in the form of an offset against Husband’s equitable distribution interest. [read post]
In the Final Regulations, which went into effect on August 14 four sections from the latest rulemaking package were withdrawn: proposed Sections 999.305(a)(5), 999.306(b)(2), 999.315(c), and 999.326(c). [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 5:30 am by Elizabeth Howell
Previously, KRS 405.021(1)(b) and (c) shifted the burden in Troxel when a grandparent was seeking visitation after the death of his or her child; however, the Supreme Court recently found that the presumption shift was unconstitutional. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 8:17 am by Marcus Evans (UK) and Janine Regan (UK)
 The CJEU heard this case jointly with two other related cases – the joined cases C-511/18 and C-512/18 (La Quadrature du Net and Others) from France, and case C-520/18 (Ordre des barreaux francophones et germanophone and others) from Belgium. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 4:57 pm by Eugene Volokh
"For example, they were not willing (a) to support hormone therapy for transitioning, even if it was medically necessary or recommended, or counseling that was not consistent with their religious beliefs; (b) to support boys wearing girls' clothes or vice versa; (c) to allow H.V. or other foster children to date in the future; or (d) to call a foster child by their preferred name if it was different from their given name. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 5:06 am by Russell Knight
“The guardian ad litem shall testify or submit a written report to the court regarding his or her recommendations in accordance with the best interest of the child” 750 ILCS 5/506(a)(2) If for some reason, private medical information is [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 8:37 am by Elizabeth Howell
Such flipping occurs in KRS 405.021(1)(b), granting a rebuttable presumption that grandparent visitation is in the child’s best interest if there is a significant and viable relationship. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 6:08 am by Joel R. Brandes
 The Appellate Division observed that pursuant to Domestic Relations Law ' 240(1Bb)(c)(7), the court may direct a parent to contribute to a child=s education. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
New York is a parent friendly state: our courts routinely note that it is in a child’s best interests to have regular and meaningful contact with both of his or her parents . . . . [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 7:13 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
In discussing the best interests of the child in Young v. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
It therefore, severed that exception but kept the broad restriction on the use of robocalls intact, recognizing “Congress’s continuing interest in protecting consumer privacy. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 9:40 am by Jack Sharman
While we are on the subject of law professors, note that distinguished Columbia professor John C. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 1:31 pm by Jeffrey Neuburger
Other objections are merely based on unhappiness about the content of the speech, albeit in many cases true, such as comments that are critical of individuals, their businesses or their interests. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 1:31 pm by Jeffrey Neuburger
Other objections are merely based on unhappiness about the content of the speech, albeit in many cases true, such as comments that are critical of individuals, their businesses or their interests. [read post]