Search for: "ITS SERVICES, INC v. USA"
Results 1041 - 1060
of 1,269
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2011, 1:40 pm
In the second of this week’s opinions, the Court decided Astra USA, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 12:27 pm
American Express Travel Related Services, Inc., No. 07-CV-1707 (N.D. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 6:19 am
Vibram USA, Inc. arose from a lawsuit in which the family of Abebe Bikila sued shoe maker, Vibram, alleging that Vibram used Bikila’s name to promote its FiveFingers line of minimalist running shoes. [read post]
29 May 2012, 10:02 am
That case (Tessera, Inc., v. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 12:00 pm
DiMattia et al. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 11:31 am
In Enigma Software Group USA, LLC v. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:00 pm
– Facebook’s contractual rights to users’ photos problematic: (Spicy IP)PharmaEuropean Commission probes pharmaceutical sector: (Philip Brooks),WHO Board sets course on IP, avian flu, tighter publication policy: (Intellectual Property Watch),India: The Competition Act, patents and over hyped drugs: (Part I - Spicy IP), (Part II – Spicy IP), (Part III – Spicy IP),Ignoring not the solution –… [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 6:48 am
Charter Communications, Inc., a bankruptcy case which involved the “equitable mootness” doctrine. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 2:22 pm
SODRAC 2003 Inc., 2015 SCC 57 (CanLII), [2015] 3 SCR 615, <https://canlii.ca/t/gm8b0> (“CBC v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 6:27 am
At issue in the second case, Global-Tech Appliances, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Group, Inc v Jungle Networks, Inc (Gray on Claims) BPAI holds term indefinite and summarizes reasoning behind broadest reasonable interpretation rule: Ex parte Senju Metal Industry Co (Gray on Claims) US Patents - Lawsuits and strategic steps Amkor Technology - ITC issues supplemental initial determination finding non-invalidity under 35 USC §§ 102(g) and 103(a) of certain asserted patent claims in investigation concerning Carsem's importation and sale of… [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Group, Inc v Jungle Networks, Inc (Gray on Claims) BPAI holds term indefinite and summarizes reasoning behind broadest reasonable interpretation rule: Ex parte Senju Metal Industry Co (Gray on Claims) US Patents - Lawsuits and strategic steps Amkor Technology - ITC issues supplemental initial determination finding non-invalidity under 35 USC §§ 102(g) and 103(a) of certain asserted patent claims in investigation concerning Carsem's importation and sale of… [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Indústria e Comércio v OHIM, Consorci de l'Espai Rural de Gallecs (Class 46) CFI: John Deere prevails before CFI with colour combination mark: BCS v OHIM, Deere (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI finds trademarks containing common element in identical font confusingly similar in Aldi Einkauf GmbH & Co v Goya Importaciones y Distribuciones (Class 46) CFI: RNAiFect and RNActive: who would get confused? [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 9:27 am
For more information regarding law firm disqualification due to the paralegal's possession of attorney-client confidences, see In Re Guaranty Insurance Services, Inc., Relator (No. 10-0364), where the Texas Supreme Court, on July 1, 2011 handed down a decision granting mandamus relief and directing the trial court to vacate its order granting the motion to disqualify. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 9:39 am
V. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
: Urooj Ahmad v Maya Appliances (IP Frontline) Ireland Commercial Court makes first Community designs ruling: Karen Millen Ltd v Dunnes Stores (International Law Office) Israel Boy from package of Israeli chocolate drink sues Elite for 5 million NIS (The IP Factor) Kenya Court of Appeal declines to set aside High Court order restraining Delta Connections from using DELTA (Afro-IP) South Africa South African Revenue Services loses… [read post]
26 May 2010, 6:46 am
In her report on American Needle Inc. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 8:03 am
Harris Funeral Homes, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 9:02 am
In 2011 the Texas Supreme Court issued its decision in Marsh USA, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 8:04 pm
Teleflex Inc., 550 U.S. 398, 406 (2007) (citing Graham v. [read post]
