Search for: "In re Sullivan "
Results 1041 - 1060
of 2,485
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2013, 11:35 am
The bottom line is that we’re not only seeing the end of enterprise amnesia, we’re facing the prospect of enterprise omniscience. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 6:26 pm
Who knew that people would take resource intended to educate and inform and re-purpose it for social commentary? [read post]
20 Jan 2013, 10:56 am
Benedict is really exhausted after just 10 minutes spent trying to understand what the principle of exhaustion is all aboutBack in February 2012, Justice Sullivan rejected the plaintiff's request for summary judgment. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 8:56 am
That takes us to the motion’s disposition by the court: it leaves open the possibility of re-filing the same challenge “at an appropriate time. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm
Detective Chief Inspector April Casburn has been convicted of misconduct in a public office by a jury at Southwark Crown Court after she admitted telephoning the “News of the World” on 11 September 2010, shortly after the phone hacking inquiry was re-opening. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 8:50 am
* In re Platt, 2012 WL 5337197 (Bkrtcy. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 6:32 am
Okay, maybe Sullivan's firm website picture has a bit of a come-hither look, but we're not even close to Anthony Weiner territory. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 8:30 am
Cybersecurity Articles and Posts: "When It Comes to Security, We’re Back to Feudalism" laments Bruce Schneier for Wired. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 1:21 pm
An example is the DeBeers diamond settlement, Sullivan v. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 4:45 am
— from Bob Sullivan at NBC News HR & Employee Relations Dear Evil Skippy: Can Management Require Employees To Get Flu Shots? [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 10:50 am
Furthermore, Gloria Allred herself suggested (see below), that her client needs to be allowed to speak in order to put the testimony into "context" or otherwise the testimony will not be meaningful to the public.And to that I say, calling to mind a fine legal phrase: res ipsa loquitur...not! [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 4:12 am
In 2008, people read Andrew Sullivan's Daily Dish or Paul Krugman's column in the Times or Gwyneth Paltrow's GOOP. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 9:01 pm
(This was in marked contrast to the first argument, when Sullivan not only adeptly answered the Justices’ questions but also seemed to control the flow of the argument.) [read post]
4 Oct 2012, 6:00 pm
" Worried that the new employee you're hiring might have a non-compete? [read post]
26 Sep 2012, 5:39 am
http://bit.ly/QeYSVx (Michael Schmidt) Proper Wildcard Searching: Why You Should Give a Dam* – http://bit.ly/Pjc34V (Doug Austin) Radically Reinvent The Review Process - http://bit.ly/Q2x6LK (George Kiersted) Rambus ‘Shred Days’ Ruled Spoliation, $397M Judgment Reduced - http://bit.ly/Pn446U (Jan Wolfe) Reasonable Particularity And Social Network eDiscovery - http://bit.ly/P0Kqxr (IT-Lex) State Judge Imposes $300K Sanction On… [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 10:28 am
Sullivan says it's missing everything. [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 3:00 am
They’re part of the conversation. [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 3:00 am
They’re part of the conversation. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 2:35 pm
The video with the song re-appeared on YouTube. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 2:07 pm
“We’re going to resolve it,” Sullivan said. [read post]
