Search for: "In the Matter of: Graham"
Results 1041 - 1060
of 2,072
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2010, 2:10 pm
Speed and technological obsolescence are the only protections that matter. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 6:16 am
"I'd welcome informed disagreement, but the ban on detainee transfers to the U.S. seems to me without serious justification as a matter of policy. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 2:09 pm
The context of the remarks matters because they were meant to be light in tone. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 8:03 am
By Ryan Graham and Jay Levine As we have noted in the past, data breach plaintiffs have had a difficult time maintaining their lawsuits because courts continue to find that they lack “standing. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 7:22 am
It failed in a 38-60 vote: (Purpose: To revise the provisions relating to detainee matters) Strike subtitle D of title X and insert the following: Subtitle D–Detainee Matters SEC. 1031. [read post]
7 Sep 2015, 7:13 pm
It was important for the appeal here that the ‘motivation’ found by the district court was seen as an issue of fact — a subset of some unnamed Graham factor — rather than a question of law. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 7:47 am
(Graham Funeral Ltd.) v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 5:50 pm
Graham v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 4:14 am
It does not matter that Ulbricht intended to conceal the IP address of the SR Server from public view. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 12:25 pm
"Any matters referred to us by SLAB follow the society's procedures for dealing with complaints. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 5:55 am
David de Burgh Graham: Have Bell or Rogers attempted to get any of these orders to block sites? [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 12:10 pm
For instance, HIPAA regulates the privacy and security of medical information, the Graham-Leach-Bliley Act controls how financial institutions must safeguard customer data, and the European Union's privacy directives regulate... [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 9:30 am
With Davis pending and the Fourth Circuit’s Graham case pending on this as well, I suspect Supreme Court review is likely relatively soon. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 10:44 am
There is nothing to keep senators from expressing their opinions in advance of the trial, as Lindsey Graham has done by branding the house investigation B.S. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 7:51 pm
In sum, the district court properly concluded that the record did not support a case of obviousness of the '552 patent as a matter of law. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 11:16 am
§ 103 and serves to invalidate patents “if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter would have been obvious. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 11:03 am
Michael Pauling, Senior Assistant Attorney General; and Graham M. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 11:31 am
It would not matter whether the agreement is optional or a condition of employment. [read post]
4 Jul 2020, 8:40 pm
It doesn’t matter who is on the President’s crazy list. [read post]
