Search for: "In the Matter of Recovery I, Inc." Results 1041 - 1060 of 1,075
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Oct 2007, 9:00 am
Given the finding of erroneous dating practices (by inference, backdating), the court questions how it is that the interests of the corporation are not, or at least do not appear to be, adverse to the interests of the individual defendants.With the disclosure implicitly admitting to backdating but the company taking no steps to remedy the practice, the court concluded that "[i]n these circumstances, it would be odd if Delaware law required a stockholder to make demand on… [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 11:35 am
If you'd told the truth about strokes I'd have been so scared I wouldn't have bought your product at all, no matter what my prescriber told me, and I wouldn't have been gotten kidney failure…. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 10:26 am
The Dormans raise three issues, which we restate as follows: I. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 4:55 am
Leonard to determine he could represent both in the lawsuit, he obtained a signed waiver from each which stated they had “separate counsel with whom I have been given an opportunity to consult regarding this matter. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 10:48 am
Jude Medical, Inc., 425 F.3d 1116, 1119-21 (8th Cir. 2005), and Castano v. [read post]
1 Sep 2007, 8:09 am
§ 1054(b)(1)(H)(i), an anti-age-discrimination provision of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act ("ERISA"). [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 11:28 am
Home Depot USA, Inc., Gershman-Brown & Associates, Inc., and G.B. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 7:37 am
On December 5, 2006, M-I submitted a bill of costs to the clerk seeking recovery of costs under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 9:53 am
NCT Group, Inc., 863 A.2d 772, 795-96 (2004). [read post]
9 May 2007, 1:34 pm
The Reporters take the position that aggregating litigation is simply a matter of degree, and we disagree. [read post]
8 May 2007, 5:27 am
Make sure you have personal knowledge of all matters asserted, or else it "can and will be used against you in a court of law. [read post]