Search for: "In the Matter of a Grand Jury Investigation" Results 1041 - 1060 of 2,671
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2017, 4:13 am by SHG
The prosecutor alone will tell the jury what the law is and why they should indict; and the grand jury will do his bidding. [read post]
21 May 2017, 2:34 pm by Graham Smith
It is akin to prior restraint on a grand scale, conducted not by courts after hearing evidence but by private entities made to act as investigator, prosecutor, judge, jury and executioner. [read post]
21 May 2017, 2:34 pm by Graham Smith
It is akin to prior restraint on a grand scale, conducted not by courts after hearing evidence but by private entities made to act as investigator, prosecutor, judge, jury and executioner. [read post]
20 May 2017, 7:19 am by Andrew Kent
The Department of Justice regulations under which Mueller was appointed tell us that special counsels are used to conduct “criminal investigation[s] of a person or matter. [read post]
19 May 2017, 10:39 am by Ken White
It's like an indictment, only not issued by a grand jury. [read post]
19 May 2017, 9:13 am by Helen Klein Murillo
Broadly speaking, the committee must have congressionally authorized subject matter jurisdiction, the investigation must have a “valid legislative purpose” (though Congress need not specify what it plans to do as a result of the investigation), and it may inquire only about information generally relevant to its jurisdiction. [read post]
19 May 2017, 8:58 am by Quinta Jurecic
On July 5, 2016, Director Comey held his press conference concerning the federal grand jury investigation of Secretary Clinton’s emails. [read post]
19 May 2017, 5:03 am by Paul Rosenzweig
"  [There is one exception to this rule—a rarely invoked idea of a "special grand jury. [read post]
18 May 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Grand juries and prosecutors (akin to the House), as well as judges and petit juries (akin to the Senate) are all supposed to discharge their duties consistent with the public interest. [read post]
18 May 2017, 11:27 am by Susan Hennessey, Helen Klein Murillo
Attorney ‘whose duty it shall be to bring the matter before the grand jury for its action. [read post]
17 May 2017, 4:36 pm
ADDED: I see no reason not to say this is the perfect move.AND: NBC reports: Former Trump aides Michael Flynn and Paul Manafort have emerged as key figures in the FBI's investigation into Russian campaign interference....Officials say multiple grand jury subpoenas and records requests have been issued in connection with the two men during the past six months in the ongoing probe into whether the Trump campaign colluded with Russian attempts to influence the election,… [read post]
14 May 2017, 4:21 am by Jack Goldsmith
For a political appointee in the Executive branch, loyalty matters. [read post]
12 May 2017, 2:11 pm by Bob Bauer
Comey to stop him from testifying in a congressional proceeding, to investigators, or to a grand jury. [read post]
11 May 2017, 8:00 am by Daniel Perlman
Grand Theft Property worth more than $950 is considered grand theft and is charged as a misdemeanor. [read post]
11 May 2017, 7:05 am by Paul Rosenzweig
  In criminal investigations (which this is NOT) it would include grand jury testimony and other forensic evidence. [read post]
4 May 2017, 1:16 pm by Howard Snader
When facing any investigation for a misdemeanor or felony, it is a serious matter. [read post]
3 May 2017, 1:05 pm
The grand jury process, however, is not the exclusive means by which the Government may collect evidence prior to indictment. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 7:13 am
The grand jury investigation, however, continues still. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 5:37 am by Eugene Volokh
In light of [a] pending motion [alleging prosecutorial misconduct], the matter was resubmitted to the Grand Jury …. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 6:42 am by Joy Waltemath
” Noting that the employee filed a Title VII charge with the EEOC, which filed with the court a statement of facts its investigation revealed, Judge Merritt argued that “surely if those facts were provided to the jury, a jury verdict for Phillips should not be set aside as based on insufficient evidence as my colleagues assert. [read post]