Search for: "J. D. C." Results 1041 - 1060 of 8,370
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Dec 2021, 10:05 pm by Bill Marler
I could not have said it better and PEW’s conclusion is spot on: Current poultry policies and regulations treat all Salmonella serotypes and strains as if they pose equal risks to people, despite science showing this is not the case. [read post]
22 Dec 2021, 2:30 pm by Kevin Kaufman
Excise Tax Credits and Outlay Payments for Alternative Fuel (secs. 6426(d)(5) and 6427(e)(6)(C)) 20. [read post]
22 Dec 2021, 4:07 am by Russell Knight
” 750 ILCS 5/501(c-1) Interim fees are temporary in nature and are only allowed while an Illinois divorce is pending. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 4:00 am by Deanne Sowter
This Bill received Royal Assent in May 2021 and revised the Judges Act, RSC 1985, c J-1, such that in order to be eligible for appointment to superior courts, prospective judges undertake to participate in continuing education on sexual assault law and social context (s 3(b)). [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 2:37 pm by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Advance directives for VSED are an important, yet under-appreciated, alternative.Here is the rest of the issue.Editorial - Medical Assistance in Dying: Contemporary Ethical Issues and Challenges (Marie-Alexandra Gagné, Caroline Favron-Godbout)Getting Real About Killing and Allowing to Die: A Critical Discussion of the Literature (Andrew Stumpf, Dominic Rogalski)L’objection de conscience des professionnels de la santé : une revue intégrative (Chantal Caux,… [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 1:09 pm by Dennis Crouch
§ 1052(c) provides, in pertinent part, that the PTO must deny federal registration to a trademark if it “[c]onsists of or comprises a name, portrait, or signature identifying a particular individual except by his written consent…. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 2:56 pm by Giles Peaker
In Collier v P & M J Wright (Holdings) Ltd (2007) EWCA Civ 1329 that test had been held to be the same as that for summary judgment. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Equitable estoppel, by contrast, is a doctrine imposed as a matter of fairness that "preclude[s] a person from asserting a right after having led another to form the reasonable belief that the right would not be asserted, and loss or prejudice to the other would result if the right were asserted" (Matter of Shondel J. v Mark D., 7 NY3d 320, 326 [2006]). [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Equitable estoppel, by contrast, is a doctrine imposed as a matter of fairness that "preclude[s] a person from asserting a right after having led another to form the reasonable belief that the right would not be asserted, and loss or prejudice to the other would result if the right were asserted" (Matter of Shondel J. v Mark D., 7 NY3d 320, 326 [2006]). [read post]