Search for: "John Doe 2 " Results 1041 - 1060 of 12,113
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2009, 3:07 am
April 2, 2009).The plaintiff was a passenger in a taxi cab involved in an accident with a vehicle owned by a rental car company. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 1:30 am
However, the study does find that individual Courts of Appeals vary substantially in their levels of judicial activism. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 4:53 am by jlazarevic
Evidence linking Robinson to the crime was discovered when his DNA was mistakenly collected and entered into the state’s DNA database, which matched his profile with that of the suspect profile in the “John Doe” warrant. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 7:07 am
Jun 28, 2007) (NO. 6:05CV330) Judge: Leonard Davis / John LoveHolding: Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement GRANTEDPlaintiff filed objections to Judge Love's report and recommendation that the defendant's motion for summary judgment of noninfringement be granted, primarily arguing that: (1) an incorrect standard was applied in granting summary judgment of non-infringement, (2) the Report overlooks competent evidence that defeats summary judgment of… [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 4:50 am by Erin Miller
Opinion below (9th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Case involving lawyers from Akin Gump or Howe & Russell (listed without regard to likelihood of being granted): Title: John v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 10:00 pm
Does “whoever” imply a person, and not a machine? [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 4:45 pm by Janet R. Stewart
For further guidance on these and other related matters, please contact John D. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 6:51 am by Jim Sedor
John Kitzhaber is confronting a barrage of criticism, calls for his resignation, and a potential recall petition. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 3:16 pm
Is John McCain eligible to serve as President of the United States? [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 2:33 am by John L. Welch
And so the Board was unable to assess the impact of Applicant's long use on the purchasing public.In sum, Applicant failed to carry its heavy burden under Section 2(f).TTABlog comment: Compare the Board's analysis here with that in recent Hershey case [TTABlogged here], where the Board was careful in recognizing that although a design may be de facto functional, the details or refinements may not be de jure functional: i.e, the scoring on the Hershey bar has a utilitarian purpose,… [read post]