Search for: "John Doe Corporations, 1-10" Results 1041 - 1060 of 1,366
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jan 2011, 12:16 am by Kevin LaCroix
  By my count, 12 for-profit education companies were sued during 2010, all of them after August 1, 2010. [read post]
26 Dec 2010, 9:39 pm by Marie Louise
Affirming 2(d) refusal, TTAB finds confusion likely between BAJA for camping trailers and automobiles: In re Jayco, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB affirms refusal of MTS TESTSUITE – Applicant failed to comply with disclaimer requirement: In re MTS Systems Corporation (TTABlog) Why does a subsidiary need a license agreement? [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 1:03 pm by Kara OBrien
Resp., Op. 2002-07 (May 29, 2002) (commenting that many lawyers have noted that applying the ethical rules to an ancillary business can affect the viability of the business). [9] ABA, Model Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 5.7. [10] Id., Rule 5.7, cmt. 1. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 7:28 am
So what does any of this have to do with ngmoco? [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 2:28 pm
As Chicago corporate dispute lawyers, we were interested to see a ruling in a dispute between former law partners. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 8:01 pm
I can even waive the $10 avatar-changing fee.Peter Padilla: But I like my avatar. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 3:57 am by INFORRM
The House of Lords in the British Broadcasting Corporation case [2010] 1 AC 145 appeared to be in no doubt that Article 8 conferred a right to reputation that must be balanced, in an appropriate case, against the rights conferred by Article 10: see Lord Hope at [22] and [28] and Lord Brown at [69]. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 3:27 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Woodworth v Janes, 2 Johns Cas 417, 423 [NY 1801] [parties in equal fault have no rights in equity]; Sebring v Rathbun, 1 Johns Cas 331, 332 [NY 1800] [where both parties are equally culpable, courts will not "interpose in favor of either"]). [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 7:07 am by Matthew Kolken
PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE DOES 1-10; CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA; and GEORGIA DOES 1-10, Click here to read the ACLU press release. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 9:00 am by LindaMBeale
  It will likely be an exemption of more than $1 million, perhaps as much as $3.5 million (double for a couple). [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 8:26 pm by Steve Bainbridge
The idea that shareholders have the right to make the final decision about an unsolicited tender offer does not necessarily follow, for example, from the mere fact that shareholders have voting rights. [read post]