Search for: "L. Good"
Results 1041 - 1060
of 18,616
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2023, 2:33 am
The Law Offices of Thomas L. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:54 am
Introduction Decisions not to buy or sell goods or services are generally not protected by the First Amendment. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 4:22 pm
Instead, it has icy considerations and value judgments" about "what serves the public good. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 12:37 pm
Unfortunately, there is an equally long history of whistleblowers suffering for their good deeds. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 9:58 am
., decided by Justice John Segal, joined by Justice Dennis Perluss (read the opinion itself for much more, and there's also a discussion of a constitutional right to privacy claim that I blogged about separately): Neil deGrasse Tyson once said in an interview, "The good thing about science is that it's true whether or not you believe in it. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 4:07 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 11:08 am
Tax dollars go to the government, who can then allocate the money to (in theory) advance the public good—such as funding journalism. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 8:00 am
Tannebaum, Brian L. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 4:13 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 5:06 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 7:03 am
John L. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 5:06 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 9:05 pm
The empirical foundation for their analysis of what is good regulatory policy is acceptance of the inevitability of some sort of symbiosis between state regulation and self-regulation. . . . [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 8:55 am
Jodi L. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 6:50 am
L. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 3:30 am
Steven Dean, Surrey’s Silence: Subpart F and the Swiss Subsidiary Tax that Never Was, Brooklyn L. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 12:11 pm
Kang and Kandis L. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 12:04 pm
The District Court also held that the fair use exclusion for parodies under the Lanham Act’s dilution provision did not apply where the use at issue does not serve as “a designation of source for the [alleged diluter’s] own goods. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:54 am
The District Court also held that the fair use exclusion for parodies under the Lanham Act’s dilution provision did not apply where the use at issue does not serve as “a designation of source for the [alleged diluter’s] own goods. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:46 am
The District Court also held that the fair use exclusion for parodies under the Lanham Act’s dilution provision did not apply where the use at issue does not serve as “a designation of source for the [alleged diluter’s] own goods. [read post]
