Search for: "LITTLE v. SUPERIOR COURT"
Results 1041 - 1060
of 1,858
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2014, 8:54 am
In 2010 the Court issued a per curiam opinion (after calling for the record and nine relists) summarily vacating a Georgia Superior Court decision for misapplying the second (prejudice) prong of Strickland v. [read post]
20 May 2009, 4:05 am
The Appellate Division remanded the matter to Supreme Court for further action.* Case law holds that such supplements are to be adjusted to reflect salary increases that the disabled retired firefighter would have otherwise been paid had he or she remained on active duty.** In addition to "mandamus" and "certiorari," CPLR Article 78 provides for the modern version of two other "ancient writs:" the writ of quo warranto [by what authority] and the writ of… [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 12:37 pm
With the majority in Hirabayashi v. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 5:04 am
Co. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2022, 7:28 am
” Reiss v. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 11:06 am
State v. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 7:31 am
Pam KarlanRick Hills's recent post over at Prawfsblawg on the Supreme Court's decision in Riley v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 6:36 am
As Wikipedia notes, mandamus is a judicial remedy “in the form of an order from a superior court to any . . .subordinate court . . . to do or forbear from doing some specific act”. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 5:55 pm
Here is the abstract: In 1983, the California Supreme Court decided National Audubon Society v. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 10:00 am
To download a copy of the Appellate Division’s decision, please use this link: Matter of Bennor v Hewson [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 8:13 am
Group, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 11:07 am
Do you think the Court was ticked off just a little? [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 1:36 pm
In Fisher v. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 4:04 pm
In the case of Adkins v. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 5:49 pm
I have analyzed the previous filings of the city and the falsely accused players; and the city’s appeal adds little to the exchange. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 7:29 am
Subsequently, Green’s relations with his superiors soured. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 11:00 pm
But in immigration and asylum cases these qualitative comparisons are made all the time, otherwise there would have been no development of the line of case law under Article 3 that stretches from D v United Kingdom in 1995 to Limbuela v Home Secretary in 2005, all of which hinge on lack of adequate medical care abroad. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm
The US Supreme Court has spoken directly on this point in Young v. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 3:16 pm
Health First v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 8:27 am
After nine years, the trade secret misappropriation case filed by Jasmine Networks against Marvell is finally underway in Santa Clara Superior Court. [read post]
