Search for: "Law v. Cross"
Results 1041 - 1060
of 15,223
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2018, 5:00 am
An amicus brief, filed by a group of “experts on international law and foreign relations law,” argues that the district court “improperly followed dicta in Al-Bihani v. [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 6:45 am
Nonetheless, Cases like Terre Neuve Sarl v Yewdale Ltd [2020] and Etihad Airways PJSC v Flother [2020] reveal complexities in ascertaining commercial expectations and business efficacy. [read post]
A guide to interpreting the Small Business Reorganization Act of 2019 without driving yourself crazy
22 Mar 2020, 9:24 am
So, to start: First of all, the law adds a new “subchapter V” to the existing Chapter 11 of title 11. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 9:06 am
In Philip Morris USA Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 9:15 am
See, e.g., State v. [read post]
6 May 2021, 4:26 pm
Further, Warby J held that by “alleging such verbal abuse of a public speaker that the Leader of the Opposition was forced to speak up in controversial terms to defend him, crosses the common laws threshold of seriousness” [34]. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 6:53 pm
In the post-Koken decision of Bridgeman v. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 1:43 am
The cross-licence is governed by the laws of the state of California. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 9:00 am
As the Court of Appeals held in Fappiano v New York City Police Dept., 95 NY2d 738, "[a]ll government records are presumptively open for public inspection unless specifically exempted from disclosure as provided in the Public Officers Law" and further explained in Gould v New York City Police Dept., 89 NY2d 267, a government agency may withhold records sought pursuant to FOIL only if it "articulate[s] particularized and specific justification for not… [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 12:00 am
As the Court of Appeals held in Fappiano v New York City Police Dept., 95 NY2d 738, "[a]ll government records are presumptively open for public inspection unless specifically exempted from disclosure as provided in the Public Officers Law" and further explained in Gould v New York City Police Dept., 89 NY2d 267, a government agency may withhold records sought pursuant to FOIL only if it "articulate[s] particularized and specific justification for not… [read post]
1 May 2017, 1:45 pm
In Gallardo v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 8:24 am
Snap, Lee v. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 12:12 am
The blurb reads: Party autonomy has been traditionally considered as one of the leading principles used in cross-border trade law. [read post]
24 Apr 2022, 9:16 am
Doe appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 8:31 pm
↑ Thaler v. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 8:42 am
(European Commission v. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 9:48 am
The ensuing investigation excluded any violation of US customs law. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm
Matter of Digital Forensics Unit v Records Access Officer 2023 NY Slip Op 01476 Decided on March 21, 2023 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm
Matter of Digital Forensics Unit v Records Access Officer 2023 NY Slip Op 01476 Decided on March 21, 2023 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 8:14 am
Such transfers are considered lawful under the GDPR only if a valid transfer mechanism is relied upon and applied to ensure that the personal data is adequately protected in the third country to which it is transferred. [read post]
