Search for: "Levell v. State"
Results 1041 - 1060
of 29,808
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2008, 6:27 pm
So far, September has produced two summary orders of interest.In United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 5:06 am
State v. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 10:32 am
Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 5:45 am
Co-authors Lydia Webb and Rusty Tucker Until Monarch Midstream v. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 5:00 am
The first level was layered in Buck v. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 4:58 am
The Secretary of State disagreed. [read post]
24 Jul 2010, 10:04 am
However, they rejected the defence of fair comment on the basis that it was not comment “on facts truly stated”. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 7:35 am
US v. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 9:59 am
While the case is undoubtedly an important victory, it was at a state-level trial court, so multiple levels of appeal are still possible. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 5:22 am
In Willie Mae Scott (plaintiff) v. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 2:48 am
Held: In the context of the Framework Decision, the most obvious purpose of insisting EAWs being issued by “judicial authority” was to ensure objectivity (including freedom from political or executive influence) in decision-making and to enhance confidence in a system that was going to lead to a new level of mutual cooperation, including the surrender of member states’ own nationals to other member states. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 2:48 am
Held: In the context of the Framework Decision, the most obvious purpose of insisting EAWs being issued by “judicial authority” was to ensure objectivity (including freedom from political or executive influence) in decision-making and to enhance confidence in a system that was going to lead to a new level of mutual cooperation, including the surrender of member states’ own nationals to other member states. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 6:44 am
In United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 1:41 pm
Microsoft intervened and ultimately resolved the issue.Finally, Ericsson v. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 5:11 am
SEC v. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 8:01 am
In United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 8:38 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
The key to that decision was not what the Court did or did not do in Bowers, but the sea change in social attitudes about homosexuality and the development of gay rights at the state and local levels. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 1:41 am
In the recent case of Flood v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 1:44 pm
The State Board of Equalization was rightly slammed in that decision for doing stuff it shouldn't have done (and not doing stuff it should have done). [read post]
