Search for: "Likely v. State" Results 1041 - 1060 of 82,216
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Dec 2023, 2:44 am by Orin S. Kerr
  But Section IV(C) seems like an important section to focus on, not the one sentence about Terry stops.The post You Might Want to Read More Sentences of <i>Arizona v. [read post]
8 May 2022, 7:14 pm by lennyesq
When it comes to a potential dismantling of Roe, though, it remains to be seen how far criminalization will extend in different states and what exactly the landscape will look like. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 4:42 pm by Andrew Koppelman
Like other legal limits on the state, such as the protection of shareholders by limited liability or the protection against unreasonable searches and seizures, it is not outside the law, but an artifact of law. [read post]
24 Feb 2008, 8:54 am
But states like California that have agreed to comply and ones like Pennsylvania that have requested a deadline extension are not affected--driver's licenses from those states will continue to work for entering federal buildings and flying commercially. [read post]
5 May 2011, 5:00 am by Victoria VanBuren
We thought you would like to read some interesting commentary about the opinion: AT&T Mobility, LLC v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 2:35 pm by Steven R. Morrison
 After all, as Justice Holmes said in Gitlow v. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 10:16 am
In a Letter to the Editor published in the Albany Times Union today, Neil V. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 10:15 am by Jon
However, the Court has held that the feds may not commandeer the cooperation of state agents, in Mack and Printz v. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 2:47 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
Here is the abstract: While most citizens would likely regard being seized by... [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 7:32 am
The United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments today in the case of American Electric Power v. [read post]
16 Oct 2024, 6:25 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
This ruling clarifies the state's authority to bring a case like this, holding that the state is not required to prove a "policy or practice" of discriminating against student victims of gender-based violence and harassment.The case is State of New York v. [read post]