Search for: "Long v. United States"
Results 1041 - 1060
of 21,077
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2016, 6:46 am
At issue are certified questions of state law from the United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio, Western Division. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 12:16 pm
Here's a snippet:"In United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 11:43 am
Foster v. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 5:12 pm
United States, 425 F. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 12:01 pm
SEC (2018) (Thomas, J., concurring); see also United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 9:11 am
Vaught, 682 N.W. 2d 284 (Neb. 2004); United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 9:38 am
United States (1959) (Black, J., dissenting), "inconsistent with the spirit of [our] Bill of Rights," to try or punish a person twice for the same offense? [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 4:55 pm
For example, there’s United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 1:44 am
Plain & Fancy Kitchens, Inc., 218 Va. 533, 238 S.E.2d 800 (1977) establishes, the long-arm statute exists “to assert jurisdiction, to the extent permissible under the Due Process Clause of the Constitution of the United States, over nonresidents who engage in some purposeful activity in Virginia. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 1:44 am
Plain & Fancy Kitchens, Inc., 218 Va. 533, 238 S.E.2d 800 (1977) establishes, the long-arm statute exists “to assert jurisdiction, to the extent permissible under the Due Process Clause of the Constitution of the United States, over nonresidents who engage in some purposeful activity in Virginia. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 8:33 am
People in the United States are flocking to cities and rubbing shoulders at greater rates than ever before. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 8:33 am
People in the United States are flocking to cities and rubbing shoulders at greater rates than ever before. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 4:13 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:16 am
(For purposes of our discussion, we will set aside the question whether, under United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 12:04 am
The Decision in UP v Hungary – Achmea does not apply to ICSID Tribunals On 9 October 2018, the Tribunal in UP and CD Holding Internationale v Hungary (ICSID Case No. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 7:57 am
The answer is yes, the divorce will be recognized in the United States, so long as the divorce was obtained by a Court that had authority to do so and the divorce was granted legally. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 10:30 am
These claims must be brought in the United States Court of Federal Claims. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 10:51 am
These claims must be brought in the United States Court of Federal Claims. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 9:16 am
In Padilla v. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 4:30 am
But a question for those who do: Is the long-term upshot of Herring v. [read post]
