Search for: "MATTER OF B T B" Results 1041 - 1060 of 20,066
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Case Law, 6th edition, VII.E.16.4.1, and VII.E.16.5.4; cf. e.g. also T 33/07; T 321/07; T 1168/08; T 1634/09). [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 9:01 am by Rebecca Tushnet
A: not thinking yet about doctrine, though for fair use it doesn’t matter what the subject matter is.Ochoa: benefits of ©: not really about incentivizing creation, but about incentivizing distribution: publishers want exclusivity. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 6:32 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
“Until this matter is resolved, the judges’ national union, IFPTE, will act as the voice for the immigration judges. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver
The patent in suit refers in general to routine experimentation for the determination of the multiplication factors and the factor B without providing any information as to how the experimentation should be performed. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 8:21 am by JB
As you can see from that last sentence, things didn't turn out precisely as expected.As of now, only Trump has gotten over Rule 40(b)'s hurdle. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 11:44 pm by Roel van Woudenberg
The patent, granted in 2011, had been opposed on the grounds of Article 100(c), 100(b) and 100(a) EPC for lack of novelty and inventive step.In the appealed decision, the opposition division had held that the process claimed in auxiliary request 10 did not add subject-matter and that it was novel. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
We can thus imagine the public or the legislature split into several different groups, each with its own policy preferences and its own voting strength; where there's a + in the columns labeled 0→A, A→B, and 0→B, that indicates that the group would vote to move from the first position to the second: Group Most prefers Next preference Most dislikes 0→A A→B 0→B Attitude Voting strength 1 0 A B "As little… [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
Sometimes, even when it make sense, things don’t work out well. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 5:20 am
Or did they also only sit the Chemical EQE Papers A and B, and not P3 and P4? [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 3:30 am by Mark McKenna
So, not surprisingly, registration does sometimes matter to courts – indeed, in its recent B&B Hardware decision, the Supreme Court described it as significant. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 4:08 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Two aspects: (1) “matter of concern” in normal and intended use; (2) if you can’t see it we don’t care. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 10:28 pm by Daniel Richardson
  He sat on the matter for several weeks and filed an imprudent motion at the last minute. [read post]