Search for: "Marriage of Brown" Results 1041 - 1060 of 1,604
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2011, 10:36 am by Record on Appeal
In making its decision, the California court emphasized that its decision applied regardless of the subject matter of the initiative -- in other words, the court's ruling was not based on the fact that the Proposition 8 case involved a challenge the voter approved amendment to the California Constitution that defines marriage as between a man and a woman. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 9:33 am by guest-writer
Susan Brown, one of the directors of the National Center for Family and Marriage Research, the “relationship between education and divorce is not straight-forward. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 4:26 pm
  And on the liberal side, there are the exact opposite preferences:  not liking strict Article III limits but being pro-gay-marriage. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 12:33 pm by Steve
In the photograph are Governor Brown and former Mayor Newsom, both opponents of Proposition 8. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 12:20 pm by Michael Haggerson
When the same-sex marriage ban was initially struck down last year [JURIST report] by the US District Court for the Northern District of California [official website], then-governor Arnold Schwarzenegger and former attorney general and current Governor Jerry Brown [official website],... [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 10:59 am by Joe Palazzolo
Jerry Brown and Arnold Schwarzenegger before him would not. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 10:26 am by Lyle Denniston
Brown (Circuit docket 10-16696) to offer their views on the impact of the California court ruling on the Article III issue. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 10:01 am
Brown: The Court has posted the ruling online at this link. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 4:21 pm
Such choice is 'first.' In formulating our holding, we are guided by and adopt the cogent analysis of Justice Chin in his concurring and dissenting opinion in In re Marriage of Harris, supra, 34 Cal.4th at pp. 247-250; see also the concurring and dissenting opinion of Justice Brown at pages 251-253. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 4:21 pm
Such choice is 'first.' In formulating our holding, we are guided by and adopt the cogent analysis of Justice Chin in his concurring and dissenting opinion in In re Marriage of Harris, supra, 34 Cal.4th at pp. 247-250; see also the concurring and dissenting opinion of Justice Brown at pages 251-253. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:03 am by David Gans
” The story of this constitutional transformation is essential to the Supreme Court’s many landmark rulings honoring the Constitution’s promise of equality for all persons, including Brown v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 6:46 am by Paul Horwitz
 The same phrase has become equally important to advocates of same-sex marriage and gay rights. [read post]
Late last week, the Senate Judiciary Committee voted to completely repeal the discriminatory and unconstitutional Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 2:26 pm
  Dividing Property Spouse, for the purposes of property claims, includes married persons and persons cohabiting in marriage-like relationships for longer than two years. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 12:58 pm
  The California Supreme Court did something in Marriage of Harris. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 1:16 pm by Andrew & Danielle Mayoras
James Brown didn’t update his documents after his marriage or after the birth of his last child, James Brown II. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 3:30 am by Jasmine Joseph
Business and Constitutional Originalism in the Roberts Court Vikram D. [read post]