Search for: "Matter of Election Reform Amendment"
Results 1041 - 1060
of 1,603
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2014, 7:46 am
The idea complements efforts to pass a constitutional amendment on campaign finance reform or increase disclosures and transparency, which focus on refereeing the conduct of the money players. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 2:26 pm
In my opinion, no matter where you come down on the political spectrum, the notions promoted by “tort reformers” are not supported when you truly understand what this “reform” movement is all about. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 8:35 pm
In the specific case of China, Professor Tong posits that constitutional government "by the Chinese people includes the following elements, such as written constitution, people's sovereignty, limited government, retraint of power, guaranty of basic human rights or citizens' fundamental rights, the representative democracy on the basis of general election, constitutional control of armies, judicial independence, the constitutional supervision or constitutional review." [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 11:14 am
SARs do no meet legally cognizable standards for search or seizure under the Fourth amendment. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 4:57 pm
Goodlatte announced review: not necessarily reform. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 9:45 am
Election Comm’n, United States Supreme Court (4/2/14) Civil Rights, Communications Law, Constitutional Law, Election LawThe Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 and the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002, impose base limits, restricting how much money a donor may contribute to a particular candidate or committee, and aggregate limits, restricting how much money a donor may contribute in total to all candidates or committees, 2 U.S.C. 441a. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:23 pm
NGOs — have shown that they can play ball when it really matters. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 8:17 am
Campaign finance reform cannot take place in the current Supreme Court’s airless room. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 7:49 am
Where these same jurists instead elevate “the public’s interest in preserving a democratic order in which collective speech matters”? [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 9:00 am
Federal Election Commission or Schuette v. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 9:40 pm
In the case of Turkey, users’ platforms that played a role in facilitating discussion on sensitive political matters were silenced just before elections. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
How to Tell a Revision From an Amendment The key and difficult question, of course, is what differentiates “amendments” from “revisions. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 2:17 pm
Back then, and for many years afterwards, the ACLU was at the vanguard of defending what it saw as revered First Amendment principles against the evils of certain campaign reform laws. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 9:51 am
Back then, and for many years afterwards, the ACLU was at the vanguard of defending what it saw as revered First Amendment principles against the evils of certain campaign reform laws. [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 5:30 am
Starbuzz Tobacco Inc.: What hookahs can teach us about 3-D printing, copyright. http://t.co/ntl2HgEBrv -> EU Overhaul of Collective Rights Management for Online Music http://t.co/Ce5tGsnR34 -> Employer Who Takes Over Employee’s Social Media Accounts May Commit Privacy Breach–Maremont v Susan Fredman Design http://t.co/cGEnphRaic -> Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2014-03-05 http://t.co/ehjHxVhooT -> Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2014-03-05: ECommerce vendor… [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 4:03 pm
In need of reform? [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 9:10 am
Since Congress punted on the matter (again and again, despite their righteous indignation), the Treasury Department and the IRS proposed to amend the regulations in order to address the issue. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 3:25 pm
The Elected Officials’ Retirement Plan. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 1:49 pm
Back in September, Governor Christie also signed a bill enacting an eminent domain “reform” law that actually increases the risk of abusive takings instead of alleviating it. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 7:36 am
” But the retirees formed a new contract with the state in 1969 when they elected to switch to pensions with COLAs; and the 1981 amendments impaired this new contract. [read post]
