Search for: "Miller v. State of California" Results 1041 - 1060 of 1,474
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
If the Supreme Court Decides the Proposition 8 Sponsors Lack Standing, What Will Happen to Same-Sex Marriage in California? Part Two in a Two-Part Series of Columns
25 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Supreme Court said in Karcher v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
First District Holds CEQA Remedies Provision Allows Park District’s Eminent Domain Action To Proceed Pending Preparation of Project EIR So Long As Property Not Actually Acquired
24 Apr 2013, 3:18 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  For nearly all that time, the firm also has written Miller & Starr, California Real Estate 3d, a 12-volume treatise on California real estate law. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Chocolate pain: Ghirardelli case continues for one product
22 Apr 2013, 7:46 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Miller v. [read post]
43(B)log - http://tushnet.blogspot.com/
The Inbox - April 19, 2013
19 Apr 2013, 9:00 am by P. Andrew Torrez
Finally:  Mondaq has a very nice summary of the Fifth Circuit's recent opinion in Avalon Legal Information Svcs. v. [read post]
Suits by Suits - http://www.suitsbysuits.com/
Law and Media Round Up – 15 April 2013
15 Apr 2013, 7:56 am by INFORRM
Neil Turner v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 12/04/2013; Ms Carina Trimingham v Daily Mirror, Clause 1, 11/04/2013; Ms Carina Trimingham v Metro, Clause 1, 11/04/2013; Bath & North East Somerset Council v The Times, Clause 5, 11/04/2013; Warren Hamilton Daily Mai, Clause 1, 11/04/2013; Catherine Whiteside The Scottish Sun, Clauses 1, 5, 11/04/2013; Ms Lynne Hales v Daily Mail, Clause 6, 11/04/2013; Emilie Sandy v The Citizen (Gloucester) v… [read post]
Inforrm's Blog - http://inforrm.wordpress.com
Precisely What Will, or Should, Happen to Same-Sex Marriage in California if the Supreme Court Finds in Hollingsworth v. Perry That the Proposition 8 Sponsors Lack Standing? Part One in a Two-Part Series of Columns
10 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Perry, the case (argued late last month) in which two same-sex couples sued in federal court to invalidate California’s Proposition 8, a voter-adopted state constitutional ban on gay marriage. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
Residential Project Exempt From CEQA Review Under Government Code Section 65457 As Consistent With Specific Plan For Which Program EIR Previously Certified; First District Also Holds New GHG Thresholds Do Not Constitute “New Information” Requiring Supplemental EIR For Specific Plan
10 Apr 2013, 3:20 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  For nearly all that time, the firm also has written Miller & Starr, California Real Estate 3d, a 12-volume treatise on California real estate law. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Accessing Ex-girlfriend's MySpace Account and Posting Offensive Content Results in Conviction
7 Apr 2013, 9:20 am by Venkat
California; and Snyder v. [read post]
Technology & Marketing Law Blog - http://blog.ericgoldman.org/
Recent Prisoner Free Exercise Cases
31 Mar 2013, 2:13 pm by Howard Friedman
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, 2013 U.S. [read post]
Religion Clause - http://religionclause.blogspot.com/
Why The U.S. Supreme Court Should Not Fear That Denying the Proposition 8 Sponsors Federal Standing Will Weaken The Initiative Device (And a Few Other Thoughts on the Oral Argument in Perry v. Hollingsworth)
28 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Supreme Court’s oral argument on Tuesday in Perry v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
Appealing from a Non-Appealable Order? Really?
27 Mar 2013, 3:14 pm by Donna Bader
 In Good v. [read post]
An Appeal to Reason - http://www.anappealtoreason.com/
Spring CEQA Roundup
20 Mar 2013, 3:06 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  (LA Neighbors United v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Second District Rejects CEQA Challenge To EIR for Riverbed Sand And Gravel Mining Project, Upholds Santa Barbara County’s Discretion to Formulate Project-Specific Threshold of Significance, and Finds EIR’s Erroneous “Not Significant” Conclusion Nonprejudicial
11 Mar 2013, 4:46 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  For nearly all that time, the firm also has written Miller & Starr, California Real Estate 3d, a 12-volume treatise on California real estate law. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Vitamin C Claims Preempted
5 Mar 2013, 12:36 pm by Michelle Yeary
            We first happened upon Loreto v. [read post]
Drug and Device Law - http://druganddevicelaw.blogspot.com/
Trial: Takeda Didn’t Warn of Actos Cancer Risk
4 Mar 2013, 4:02 pm
The case is Cooper v. [read post]
Dallas Fort Worth Injury Lawyer Blog - http://www.dallasfortworthinjurylawyer.com/
The First of Many Expected Five-Four Rulings at the Supreme Court this Term: Clapper v. Amnesty International USA Rejects Plaintiffs’ Standing to Challenge Foreign Surveillance
28 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
  The case, Clapper v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
Supreme Court Will Review CEQA Decision From Fifth District In Wal-Mart Citizen Initiative Case
15 Feb 2013, 3:31 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  For nearly all that time, the firm also has written Miller & Starr, California Real Estate 3d, a 12-volume treatise on California real estate law. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Does BLAG Have Standing in the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) Case in Front of the Supreme Court?
13 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Perry, the plaintiffs challenge California’s voter-adopted ban on same-sex marriage (Proposition 8), and in the other, United States v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
ASA FIRED FOR FLASHING
12 Feb 2013, 6:27 pm by Rumpole
 And so it has come to pass that a young assistant state attorney, who frequented an aforementioned establishment,  ( one would expect in an attempt to satisfy some prurient interest, see, e.g, Miller v. [read post]
Justice Building Blog - http://justicebuilding.blogspot.com/
Untitled
7 Feb 2013, 1:18 pm by Jon Sands
United States v. [read post]
Ninth Circuit Blog - http://circuit9.blogspot.com/