Search for: "Nelson v. State" Results 1041 - 1060 of 1,917
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2013, 2:50 pm by Robert Kreisman
Related blog posts: $222,000 Jury Verdict For Car Repair Customer’s Toe Injured by Hydraulic Lift Baseball Decision In Post-Season-State Supreme Court to Decide Whether Fans Can Sue When Hurt by Something Other Than On-Field Action $233,000 Jury Verdict to Injured for Fall at Merchandise Mart; Nelson v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 7:09 am by Unknown
The lever for advancing the matter will be the posting by PDVSA of a largely token bond of $10,000 in order to obtain the new share certificate (Petróleos de Venezuela, S.A. v. [read post]
22 May 2015, 5:05 am
That trade secret protection, as weak or as strong as one views it, is an alternative form of protection for an invention was emphatically recognized by the United States Supreme Court in the 1974 case of Kewanee Oil Co. v Bicron Oil. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 8:52 am by Harold O'Grady
States have the right to call an Article V convention without the concurrence of the Congress whenever two-thirds of the states wish to participate. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 4:02 am by Lawrence Solum
Nelson, dealing with the constitutional status of same-sex marriage; Iqbal v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 6:58 am by Anna Christensen
In the New York Times, Gabriel Nelson of Greenwire reports on an amicus brief filed by twelve states urging the Supreme Court to overturn a lower court decision allowing polluters to be sued for their contributions to global warming. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 8:44 am by Lawrence Solum
Nelson, dealing with the constitutional status of same-sex marriage; Iqbal v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 12:10 pm by Rick Garnett
Is the Court’s per curiam ruling in Zubik v. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
Austin Sarat is Associate Provost, Associate Dean of the Faculty and William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Jurisprudence and Political Science at Amherst College. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 3:19 am by Peter Mahler
 Nelson argued for a 25% DLOM based on restricted stock studies and case precedent. [read post]