Search for: "Paul Branch "
Results 1041 - 1060
of 1,814
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2014, 10:40 am
By Paul Kehoe Today, without the fanfare of a public meeting, the U.S. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 9:38 am
The court — in an opinion agreed to in relevant part both by the five conservative justices and Justices John Paul Stevens and Ruth Bader Ginsburg — argued that: Congress’ power under § 5 … extends only to “enforc[ing]” the provisions of the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 11:04 am
Overall, I don’t have much to add to Paul Gillis’s blog post: The arrogance of the firms is stunning. [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 6:55 am
Paul later highlighted one amendment he found particularly foolish. [read post]
21 Jun 2014, 7:00 am
Paul declared it “on the whole, a good effort. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 5:09 am
” Commentary on Abramski comes from Noah Feldman of Bloomberg View, who contends that the decision “should stand as a reminder to the liberal justices that, when the chips are down, they really do believe that the law’s purpose and context matter”; from Adam Winkler, who argues in The New Republic that the decision shows that “Justice Kennedy is willing to support gun control,” which “may be the most important signal to come from the… [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 4:56 am
Indeed, the fact that these lawyers have received these clearances reflects the Executive Branch’s determination that they can be trusted with classified information. [read post]
14 Jun 2014, 7:00 am
United States and explored the ruling’s impact on foreign affairs exceptionalism, Executive Branch authority, and foreign relations law. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 11:05 am
But there is no guarantee that parliamentary officers will be effective at holding the executive branch accountable. [read post]
28 May 2014, 8:00 am
Paul Horwitz. [read post]
27 May 2014, 7:12 am
Guest Post Written by: Paul Tharp, Esq. [read post]
17 May 2014, 7:00 am
Rand Paul is filibustering it. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 1:26 pm
Paul Davis, a prosecutor, thinks differently—beginning with the defense’s failure to establish (as it must) why Lessemun’s appointment is necessary to begin with. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 8:23 am
(credit for photo of law school; prior post) Highlights from the conference agenda include speeches by James Crawford and Philip Allott, both of the University of Cambridge, as well as a presentation on the American Law Institute Fourth Restatement project by the project’s Co-Reporter, Paul B. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 5:31 am
Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) has recently acknowledged the inevitability of immigration reform stating reform is a question of when, not if. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 4:08 am
By this reasoning, the judicial branch is reduced to the ministerial task of doing the other branch’s bidding. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 1:15 pm
Finally, the Court will not consider the costs of incarceration and supervised release in sentencing, because the factors in § 3553(a) do not clearly permit the Court to consider costs, and because those concerned about the fiscal implications of criminal justice policy should petition the other branches of government and should not ask the Court to consider such implications in sentencing an individual defendant. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 7:47 am
Attorney Paul J. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 7:35 am
(Keith Paul Bishop, In The Year 2525, If Man Is Still Alive, If Woman Can Survive, They May Find Limited Liability Worker Cooperatives, California Corporate and Securities Law, March 5, 2014)." [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 1:46 pm
Paul Morris presents ever briefly. [read post]
