Search for: "People v Court"
Results 1041 - 1060
of 61,621
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2015, 12:24 pm
Compare the Court of Appeal's opinion with a contemporary newspaper account of the events. [read post]
2 May 2024, 1:03 pm
Justice Corrigan authors a powerful opinion that holds that it's not permissible for the police to conduct a Terry stop just because someone's in a high crime area and pretending to tie his shoe behind a car in order to avoid the police, and Justice Evan authors an equally powerful concurrence (joined by a majority of the Court) that highlights the racial implications of a rule that assumes that the "normal" response to a police encounter is to welcome and/or… [read post]
1 Oct 2024, 5:55 pm
No, the Court of Appeal did not just affirm the trial court's refusal to resentence Kamala Harris based upon her conviction for murder.The petitioner here is Kwana Harris. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 5:52 am
Series on Native Sovereignty in U.S Supreme Court Cases On Indigenous Peoples’ Day, Reflections on Tribal Sovereignty in Haaland v. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 12:20 pm
Wagner files his own supplemental brief.The Court of Appeal then reverses, finding that there was indeed jurisdiction to consider the motion.So apparently there was a non-frivolous argument to be made. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 10:04 am
Imagine that the first sentence of a contemporary opinion by the California Supreme Court opinion begins with the sentence: "We granted review to decide whether to overrule a 1971 pro-Miranda decision of this Court. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 11:23 am
The Court of Appeal says:"On page 4, near the end of the paragraph that started on page 3 with 'Appellants argue evidentiary error' delete the sentence 'For its part, the Attorney General offers this court no help, instead compounding the problem with a 458-page rambling respondent‟s brief plus 28-page addendum.'"Always a nice thing to have deleted (if it was initially said). [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 12:00 pm
The Court then ruled against you on the merits. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 1:55 pm
I know that everyone -- including the California Supreme Court -- has been saying this for the past 20 years, but can we please get some more judges in Riverside County? [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 1:36 pm
When you buy a truck for its fair market value of $950, and two years later someone vandalizes it, it's not a "windfall" for the court to order the defendant to pay you over $2800 -- which was the estimate that you got to repair your $950 car.So holds the California Supreme Court. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 1:52 pm
The Court of Appeal doesn't give 'em much relief.But if you read the Court of Appeal's (lengthy) opinion, you'll realize that several of these defendants will have a darn good habeas petition. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 1:05 pm
"So holds the California Court of Appeal. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 4:40 pm
Sometimes the California Court of Appeal really does get things. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 10:18 am
When you choose a home pretty much at random to rob, and stab and kill the woman inside of it, it's not at all surprising that the trial court sentences you to death and that the California Supreme Court unanimously affirms. [read post]
5 May 2014, 1:20 pm
Calvin Chism gets some good news from the California Supreme Court today. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 11:22 am
The California Supreme Court unanimously affirms a conviction and death sentence.But would you really expect otherwise? [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 12:17 pm
The Court of Appeal gives her only minimal relief. [read post]
21 Apr 2018, 6:03 pm
People v. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 8:10 am
People v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 11:31 am
The Supreme Court decided Kentucky v. [read post]
