Search for: "People v Lord"
Results 1041 - 1060
of 1,806
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2012, 6:03 am
V. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 5:13 pm
These were in response to Stonewall adverts, also on London buses, which promoted gay marriage rights with the slogan ”Some people are gay. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 8:31 am
These were in response to Stonewall adverts, also on London buses, which promoted gay marriage rights with the slogan ”Some people are gay. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:04 am
The Samaritans said “it was felt the column’s use of imagery and tone violated the dignity of people who had died by suicide and intruded into the grief of their families“. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 12:20 am
(para 173) The Judge added that whilst the primary obligation in Article 3 was a negative one, the Court had recognised a positive obligation to protect individuals from ill-treatment and that an obligation may arise even when there is no ill-treatment from the state or from other people. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 3:00 am
I’ll just comment briefly on the juiciest of the three cases, Breeden v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 2:59 am
’ Lord Bingham, DPP v Collins (here). [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 12:19 am
The decision in the House of Lords in Austin v The Commissioner of the Police of the Metropolis, finding that ‘kettling’ peaceful protesters and bystanders for 7 hours did not create a deprivation of liberty, has been heavily criticised; it was expected that the ECtHR would take a different stance. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 6:01 am
House of Lords accepted copying of trade dress with different word mark. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 11:07 am
Now consider the recent case of Stübing v Germany. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 2:16 am
Flood v Times: how does this affect calls for libel reform? [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 10:34 pm
G.J.K. 2012 BCCA 146 and Stav v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 2:03 pm
She had accessed the Bakersfield Police Department computer in reference to the White Lords of Bakersfield, a group that had written about how they were going to lock up colored people using the MDO program to incarcerate innocent people. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 7:27 am
Jeremy Bentham said in a well known passage quoted by Lord Shaw of Dunfermline in Scott v Scott [1913] AC 407, 477: “Publicity is the very soul of justice. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 5:57 pm
Jeremy Bentham said in a well known passage quoted by Lord Shaw of Dunfermline in Scott v Scott [1913] AC 417, 477: Publicity is the very soul of justice. [read post]
7 Apr 2012, 12:58 pm
Lord Dyson concluded in Lumba that this was no justification for indefinite detention, no matter how diligent the efforts of the Home Office. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 11:00 pm
Al-Jedda v. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 11:00 pm
Austin & Others v. [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 5:08 am
We note that Lord Phillips in Spiller v Joseph also doubted the need for this requirement…Any article 8 concerns are properly the subject of the law governing privacy, not defamation. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 8:56 am
’ As his Supreme Court audition, Lord Reed could not have asked for better than Axa General Insurance Ltd & Ors v Lord Advocate & Ors (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 46, the first challenge to the Scottish Parliament’s legislative competence to reach the Court since it succeeded the JCPC as devolution’s final arbiter. [read post]
